HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-15-2020, 10:16 AM   #31
1matcoman
Member
 
1matcoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 339
Likes: 821
Liked 350 Times in 134 Posts
Default Re: How about severely limiting "Super" class entries?

Quote:
Originally Posted by impstocker View Post
NHRA thought more popular with the fans than Modified..
Old Timer Here, Guys:
I enjoy watching, have raced, and have numerous friends in the .90 Classes. I agree that we all deserve a place in the NHRA system. While I can offer no more suggestions to the overcrowding issues than what has been suggested here on this forum, if NHRA, DID INDEED, think that .90 classes would be more popular, they were SORELY incorrect.

There was nothing more fun than watching a round of high-revving Modified Eliminator qualifying or eliminations.
1matcoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2020, 10:20 AM   #32
Mike Jones
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1,179
Liked 684 Times in 289 Posts
Default Re: How about severely limiting "Super" class entries?

As for Modified Eliminator…
...Vinny explains it best
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q...A082&FORM=VIRE

Last edited by Mike Jones; 01-15-2020 at 10:23 AM.
Mike Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2020, 11:09 AM   #33
Rich Biebel
VIP Member
 
Rich Biebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
Default Re: How about severely limiting "Super" class entries?

As much as we all loved Modified Eliminator and it never should have been dropped when it was, I believe it would have slowly died or dwindled anyway...

To much breakage and expensive to stay competitive....and I was involved with cars that ran it so I know first hand.....I saw guys quit after breaking an engine and just say enough is enough.....

Competition eliminator is the modern day equivalent of modified and just look at the car counts there at many races.....unsustainable ….
__________________
Rich Biebel
S/C 1479
Stock 147R
Rich Biebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2020, 02:45 PM   #34
BKSG1198
VIP Member
 
BKSG1198's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vineland, NJ
Posts: 2,622
Likes: 95
Liked 1,279 Times in 389 Posts
Default Re: How about severely limiting "Super" class entries?

You guys are also talking about them dropping Modified Production in the early 80’s. When the .90 classes started it was an affordable way to get into racing for most and there were no throttle stops at the time so fans enjoyed it. “WE” did it to ourselves and NHRA just let it go, it’s like telling your kid to go to the market to get milk and bread and they come home with candy, doughnuts & soda. If they wanted to keep it in check, they would have set a mph limit, cubic inc limit on motors or lowered the index’s. It got out of hand and because it’s still a money maker for NHRA, $320 to enter for $1,800 to win and you’re taking 50-70 cars per class, why get rid of it?
BKSG1198 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2020, 07:02 PM   #35
Bobby DiDomenico
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 923
Likes: 101
Liked 101 Times in 52 Posts
Default Re: How about severely limiting "Super" class entries?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lenny5160 View Post
I try not to run near the end of Super Street, otherwise on the way back to the trailer I'm having to dodge all of the spectators rushing to the stands for Stock Eliminator.
A friend sent me a link for this, about wet my pants laughing! Thanks!!
Bobby DiDomenico is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 01-16-2020, 09:03 AM   #36
SGSST109E
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 351
Likes: 62
Liked 126 Times in 61 Posts
Default Re: How about severely limiting "Super" class entries?

Modified was getting expensive at the time. When they started the super modified classes there was a increase back on car count. I went from E/mp to C/SM. The 1977 Summer Nationals at Engishtown had 104 cars in just C/SM. Back then I set a budget of $5,000 for the year when that was exhausted the racing stopped for that year. Now gas and tolls exceeds that.

Last edited by SGSST109E; 01-16-2020 at 09:07 AM.
SGSST109E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2020, 11:03 AM   #37
BKSG1198
VIP Member
 
BKSG1198's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vineland, NJ
Posts: 2,622
Likes: 95
Liked 1,279 Times in 389 Posts
Default Re: How about severely limiting "Super" class entries?

That’s what’s getting out of hand is the tolls. They really need to start putting a cap on how much they can charge you.
BKSG1198 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2020, 11:12 AM   #38
Rich Biebel
VIP Member
 
Rich Biebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
Default Re: How about severely limiting "Super" class entries?

There is no way there ever was 100 cars in C/SM at any event.....including the SummerNats.

30 yes, give or take a few.....right around that era...late 1970's....I was there and we raced C/SM and got down to 4 cars in class in 1978 or 1979.
We

We were number 3 qualifier in Modified Eliminator behind Garley Daniels and Billy Mansell..... before being DQ'ed for a minor head issue.....
__________________
Rich Biebel
S/C 1479
Stock 147R
Rich Biebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2020, 12:04 PM   #39
GTS340
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Las Vegas, Nv
Posts: 865
Likes: 265
Liked 1,334 Times in 406 Posts
Default Re: How about severely limiting "Super" class entries?

I've never have ran in any .90 class. Just Stock and E.T. racing. NHRA changes the way we compete, change the indexes, add and remove parts.
I thought when Super Street was born. It allowed the local racer a chance to compete at their home track. The class has obviously changed and with all the electronics. The super classes have really become handicap racing again but at the finish line. Throw the electronics out and put a dial in on the windows.
GTS340 is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 01-16-2020, 12:06 PM   #40
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: How about severely limiting "Super" class entries?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Biebel View Post
There is no way there ever was 100 cars in C/SM at any event.....including the SummerNats.

30 yes, give or take a few.....right around that era...late 1970's....I was there and we raced C/SM and got down to 4 cars in class in 1978 or 1979.
We

We were number 3 qualifier in Modified Eliminator behind Garley Daniels and Billy Mansell..... before being DQ'ed for a minor head issue.....
I raced C/SM many times when there were more than 30 C/SM cars. Running class at national events, there were enough rounds, it was like running Modified Eliminator. Enough C/SM cars to be it’s own eliminator. Indy had over 50 cars in class run offs one year I was there.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA

Last edited by Ed Wright; 01-16-2020 at 12:16 PM.
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.