|
![]() |
#31 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,815
Likes: 2,904
Liked 5,121 Times in 1,952 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Perfect. Just what's needed. 6 lb cars with parachutes against 14 second cars. Hey you in that FWD car: Better not commit the mortal sin of deep- staging. We'll throw yer a** right outta here!
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 1,571
Liked 1,827 Times in 414 Posts
|
![]()
Stock needs no weight break lower than 7.0. We're already getting well beyond the level at which the safety margin for the equipment in Stock has become to small.
A 6.5 pound class in Stock Eliminator would be about like some of the "outlaw" stuff, they wreck too many cars and tear up too much stuff, if that is what you want to do, then go and do it. The factory cars need an FX class, and the equipment that goes with it, such as a 10.5" tire rule, and the safety equipment rules that go with the speeds and elapsed times. I'd say the 8.5 second ET safety rules should be adequate.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Pierce NE
Posts: 936
Likes: 78
Liked 354 Times in 120 Posts
|
![]()
Larrys numbers are right on, now in the guide 469 hp 6.91lb for the mustang. 09 dodge now at 388hp 7.99 for the auto only 305 for the sticks a mear 83 hp differents. Tom
__________________
Tom Meyer 5240 SS Stock ??? Last edited by Tom Meyer; 04-18-2011 at 07:19 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 2
Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts
|
![]()
83 Hp. That's why we are going to complete the stick shift 09 Challenger. It will be red. 5.7 Power
__________________
Jeff Teuton 4022 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 362
Likes: 6
Liked 302 Times in 73 Posts
|
![]()
So lets say they do follow the book and make it SS only... does it go back to the SS factor of 425? or does it keep it 469 factor? SS factor is still listed at 425 but that wouldn't make much sense to me it it has 469 in stock trim....does the GT factor then change as well?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Out to Lunch
Posts: 191
Likes: 2
Liked 26 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
Help me out here.
Is the "D" Dart the only car to actually get factored out of Stock? If so, what if they allowed the Dart to move back into stock, since AA/SA didn't exist when it was ruled out? All the safety concerns are a waste of breath, you drive everyday with 80,000 pound rigs on the highway, with 2" lap and shoulder belts and no roll bar in your daily driver. Plus, 40 years of technology have made cars alot faster, heck, a current V6 Mustang has 300 HP. Times change, and either you adapt or you become extinct. Even Mr Jeff learned to use a new fangled computer. ![]() See you at the races, Wayne Kerr |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 04-19-2011 at 07:36 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Out to Lunch
Posts: 191
Likes: 2
Liked 26 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
Mr Tech man,
You are correct. I am an Idiot and am not worthy of even posting on this subject. You are and forever will be the one and only authority on NHRA S/SS racing. I apologize for even having you put forth the effort to type a reply. I will make it my lifelong journey to be able to carry your lunchbox one day. See you at the races, Wayne Kerr |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|