|
![]() |
#31 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 1,452
Liked 4,365 Times in 501 Posts
|
![]()
Ran a single at Etown last year and got $400 and a $50 credit to McLeod and loved every second of it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Commerce, Mi
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 1
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
I resent that comment...lol
Rock |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Was this change ever even mentioned to the drivers council?
Why not announce it last fall before people invested in their combination or a new one? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,422
Likes: 532
Liked 333 Times in 180 Posts
|
![]()
I guarantee that NHRA knew/has known about this for a loooooong time just kept nursing it along hoping things either would get better or that the sponsors would forget about it and finally the **** hit the fan and the biggest sponsors(dollar wise) finally said enough is enough we're done and held a gun to NHRA's heads and said fix it now or it's all over. So they hastily thought up something. Guess what they came up with ,a plan that satifies the sponsor at the expense of the racer---- are you surprised??---comp
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,123
Likes: 1,580
Liked 1,864 Times in 422 Posts
|
![]()
LOL. There's this guy I know named Rock, I'm not sure he cares for the idea of being a box on top of........................................
![]() ![]()
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
Why should thje masses know what they only want the chosen few to know. I was complaing about the new ahfs at the PRI show and was told by someone I used to respect. That something like this weas in the works. He smiled when he said it.
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Unless you are packaged in a box I wouldn't worry. LOL
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 281
Likes: 2
Liked 11 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
I've paid as much to any given contingency posting manufacturer for parts on my car in an unpopular class as those in the larger classes - in some cases more since small block Chevy parts are most often far cheaper than the unique stuff. To say I'm not entitled to contingency money because there aren't multiple cars in my class is ridiculous. And since there has never been a focus on the factoring system to balance classes against each other how can you now lump them together as a run-off.
Also I can gaurantee that having 3-4 cars in a class (or even 10) versus a single does clearly demonstrate there is no marketing benefit to that type of car which had a single at a given event. Let take the Fox-body Mustangs as an example. How many of them are there in the world and how many have performance modifications? Its a huge market, has its own section in the Jegs catalog. So why is there only a handful that run in Stock or Superstock? Under the competition structure in most cases there are "better" combinations, but there are diehards that still compete with them due to brand loyalty. Are you saying they don't deserve to be fairly rewarded by the manufacturer for representing their products, that is the intent of the contingency program. If you lump everyone together for one payout you have the eliminator. Or just say you are paying qualifying money, and just skip class eliminations altogether.
__________________
Tim Kish 3032 SS/GS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
It is not the single car class runs that have driven the sponsors away BUT there are more single car classes because of way to many classes in both stock and S/S . To many classes equals way to many class winners for the sponsors to support with the advertising buget they have in todays economy. Simple math.....What do you guys not understand? Its time to reduce/combine/drop some or just race the way it is and forget about class win money. Theres always the eliminator to win. The sponsors are not posting class win $$$$ just to pay for your entry fees and fuel bills to get to and from the races.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 317
Liked 1,105 Times in 303 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
As for racing an "oddball" combo, I race a 85 5.0 Mustang in M/S, there may only be 5 or 6 other guys running this combination, thats not my fault. I`ll bet that Ford sold many times more 5.0 stick Mustangs in 85 than MoPar sold Max Wedges, or Hemis or Chevy sold 427 Camaros, the fact that many don`t want to run a relative slow car is possible, but considering how many 5.0 Mustangs I see at the local Street Legal races leads me to believe that a 5.0 Mustang is hardly an rare,obscure, oddball car, regardless of how few run them is Stock or S/S.
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK M/S 85 Mustang |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|