|
![]() |
#31 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 409
Likes: 295
Liked 117 Times in 50 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pontiac,il.
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 234
Liked 881 Times in 165 Posts
|
![]()
In the lower class Stockers you can run a 50 year old set of seat belts, but you can not run a set of aftermarket seat belts that are outdated by one day.Go figure.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 3,292
Liked 7,147 Times in 1,598 Posts
|
![]()
Lyn, you can here in Div.1. A couple of us asked if we could use an out-of-date lap belt instead of a "50 year old set of seat belts" and we were told we could.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS What is "NORMAL"??? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 640
Likes: 73
Liked 709 Times in 213 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Jim Caughlin SS 6019 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Stuttgart, AR
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
I'm sure nobody here is going to agree with me but, a car with anti-lock brakes, 12" wide tires, massive sway bars and 10 air bags is actually safer than a 1960's muscle car. I'm sorry guys. There is a reason why I don't let my granddaughters drive old cars. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 409
Likes: 295
Liked 117 Times in 50 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,207
Likes: 1,049
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 569
Likes: 36
Liked 50 Times in 35 Posts
|
![]()
Google the recent Challenger wreck in Dade County Florida, then tell me how safe the new cars are. Up to say 50 mph, ok, but over that, no difference. Just depends on what you hit.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 249
Liked 961 Times in 267 Posts
|
![]()
Certainly 50 years of development has contributed to safer modern cars, but that crash test with the 59 Chevy was about as lopsided as it could possibly be, in favor of the newer car. The 58 thru 64 full sized Chevrolets used the "wasp waist" X frame design, which has no frame rails along the outer body, only sheet metal from the rocker panels inward, to the transmission tunnel. So virtually no structure from the firewall to the rear axle on the sides. Then add 50 years of service, possibly in salt belt regions, who is to say how solid that poor 59 Chevy under the paint.
By comparison, my 59 Ford 2 door sedan has a steel boxed frame that runs along both rocker panels from firewall to rear leaf spring mounts, with 5 crossmembers connecting the left and right sides together. I am pretty sure it would not have folded up nearly as badly as the Chevy did. Certainly the steel dashboard, 4 foot long steering shaft, lack of in door gaurd beams and many other things would make my 59 a less than pleasant place to be in a collision, than a modern car. Funny thing is, I coud sit on the fenders of my 59 without any body damage, yet my 2010 Ranger has dents in the hood from a few pine cones falling on it!
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK M/S 85 Mustang |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|