|
![]() |
#21 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
If there would be no AHFS in qualifying and no AHFS in heads-up runs, what's the point of having the AHFS? Probably 10 years ago I suggested using the data that they had collected over the years, factor *every* combination somewhere in the right zip code *once*, and be done with it. If cars weren't underfactored, who wouldn't have to protect your index in the first place.
__________________
Michael Beard - NHRA/IHRA 3216 S/SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,650
Likes: 1,942
Liked 10,767 Times in 2,238 Posts
|
![]()
I thought it was everyone's goal to run as fast as they can, must be an old school thing with me. As Steve Kopien always said " I just got'a know"
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 752
Likes: 204
Liked 136 Times in 49 Posts
|
![]()
The AHFS does not work only because the racers don't want it to work.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
Why would they want it to work on "their cars"? The game is "use the system" of poor factoring, poor supervision, poor NHRA understanding to be a "winner". That system creates a large percentage of unhappy racers because they always are believing others are using the system better than they are, or they cannot sell their car and start with the new shiny, low factored combinations.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 3,601
Liked 7,783 Times in 1,743 Posts
|
![]()
Umm Dick, I hate to say this but isn't that the "American Way"?
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
We would like it to work on everybody else's cars.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Very few are only using mechanical skill, driving skill and tune up to win. Most search the rules for loop holes to help them gain a head start in being competitive and feel hurt if their combo is discovered by NHRA by AHFS or hurt by faster competitor. Don't misunderstand this is encouraged by the rules as they exist. Only a fool would ignore this method of gaining an advantage as it exists. Just the way "NHRA class racing is" yes. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Just take your medicine like the rest of us idiots have and the classes would be close to equal if you don't want the ahfs start everybody at scratch or just keep lifting LOL
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 66
Liked 704 Times in 281 Posts
|
![]()
If cars were honestly factored when they are first produced. If a mistake is made on factor then correct quickly. If the person or persons were not biased or play favoritism towards certain racers then maybe ahfs would not be needed. Remove the "ifs" and you could remove the ahfs. Its very cool to see what some of these cars can run all out but were our own worst enemy by lifting to save from getting deserved HP
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
Diversity has become its own worst enemy in our Stk and SS classes now.
In the beginning when only 5 or ten motors were being developed by the racers it was a field of multiple same motored cars in a class. Now with the massive variations in motors and the specialty companies able to produce Cams, rockers, ported heads, aftermarket heads or rods the available motor combinations is almost unending. Great that it is possible but makes the HP method the downfall. What is needed might be classes of only Ford Mustangs with certain motors, Copo of same, Make the heads up the big deal. Formula ford, Formula VW were attempts and now sealed motors are used in round track and NMCA heads up chevy class. ( If there is an eliminator run with CIC off records or qualifying.) Modified was THE way it could be handled. I know the scolding about Money will be used by isn't a $150,000 Stocker that is Supercharged an expensive piece? If no one on this site HAD their current car and the new Mod classes were available as a level field of competition would we consider these? Would the field be more level across the field? Nascar saw the writing on the wall LONG ago, Now there is a truck race, a major car set of races, All the same cars and the fans LOVE it.. Even INDY cars are standardized... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|