|
![]() |
#21 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 458
Likes: 170
Liked 124 Times in 39 Posts
|
![]()
I know Tom, but he asked about the "fastest small block Chevy" combo. Factor wise, yes, the 327 is softer.
__________________
Sean Cour T6066 ladle |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 201
Likes: 7
Liked 11 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]()
I like the 350/360 deal. I dont know what part number carb it takes. I know my Chevy II is a light sucker. In my wild dream........I would have this car as a nice lil GT/A car. Maybe I'm being ignorant, but I appreciate all the responses.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,118
Likes: 1,576
Liked 1,837 Times in 417 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
360 350 11.00 1-4 Holley 4489-1A/SM Carb sizes - 1686x1686/1375x1437 As much as I like the 66-67 Chevy II, I think you'll have a really hard time being competitive with the late model FWD conversion cars.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
And those cars sure don't like wind. I'd I was going to run around 9.00 ETs at mid-140s I would probably not choose a Chevy 2. As much as I like them.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|