HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-04-2011, 08:35 AM   #1
cicero819
VIP Member
 
cicero819's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Aylmer Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 31
Liked 69 Times in 30 Posts
Default Pure Stock at divisionals, why not?

Why couldn't NHRA allow a new class that could be introduce as Pure Stock. This would allow new blood to be introduce to racing at a divisional level. Pure Stock would what the automobile came with, you race with. I know that many would say that's why we have sportsman in bracket racing but for me it would be a way to introduce new racers(young and old) to our sport, it sure as hell would be better than snowmobiles and Legend cars that NHRA wanted to introduce at divisionals. I just wanted to see, how many felt the same way. Claude Ruel
cicero819 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 08:49 AM   #2
voltdr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 706
Likes: 77
Liked 100 Times in 51 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock at divisionals, why not?

Just what we need, MORE classes. More classes to be teched, classified, adjusted, and complained about. There are more than enough now.
Dan
voltdr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 09:05 AM   #3
Dave Ribeiro
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Williamsburg, Va.---USA
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 1,612
Liked 56 Times in 27 Posts
Cool Re: Pure Stock at divisionals, why not?

@ We should be worrying about increasing payouts & lowering fees , not increasing classes ... Don't you think we have enough classes ?
How about Jobs ?
__________________
Dave Ribeiro 1033 STK
Dave Ribeiro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2011, 01:32 PM   #4
Rusty Davenport
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nashville N.C.
Posts: 506
Likes: 4
Liked 101 Times in 27 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock at divisionals, why not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Ribeiro View Post
@ We should be worrying about increasing payouts & lowering fees , not increasing classes ... Don't you think we have enough classes ?
How about Jobs ?
That was real good Dave........can I be your campaign manager ??? hahah
Rusty Davenport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2011, 03:51 PM   #5
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock at divisionals, why not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rusty davenport View Post
that was real good dave........can i be your campaign manager ??? Hahah
x2!
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2011, 05:25 PM   #6
cicero819
VIP Member
 
cicero819's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Aylmer Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 31
Liked 69 Times in 30 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock at divisionals, why not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Ribeiro View Post
@ We should be worrying about increasing payouts & lowering fees , not increasing classes ... Don't you think we have enough classes ?
How about Jobs ?
Dave, you're right, payouts should be increase to pay down more spots, to help racers. We could take a lesson, from the Modified and Super Modified running at Osweego Speedway N.Y and let individual who want to contribute to certain class to add some money for class winner and so on. I know that Gary Richard doesn't have to invest in drag racing but he does, mostly because he cares, one of the reasons whenever I have a chance and I need something electronic, I buy at PC. Richards and sons. Claude
cicero819 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2011, 06:25 PM   #7
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock at divisionals, why not?

Claude,is it me or do you see things in a different spectrum than most of us?

Quote Claude: We could take a lesson, from the Modified and Super Modified running at Osweego Speedway N.Y and let individual who want to contribute to certain class to add some money for class winner and so on. I know that Gary Richard doesn't have to invest in drag racing but he does, mostly because he cares

It will be a cold day in Hell before I would pay more than what these chizzlers are charging
us to enter div./nats.,to get better payouts.
And Gary is a bisnessman,and a very smart one.He will continue to sponsor the Div. 1
series as long as the bottom line dictates.His business will thrive with or without drag racing.The only product NHRA has is an ageing constituancy pushing a hasbeen product
that they are slowly choking financially.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2011, 06:32 PM   #8
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Cool Re: Pure Stock at divisionals, why not?

Look out Ed. The older and young guys on here will jump on you like they do me over talking about Indy being to long, to expensive and just to much Pro junk there.....LOL.

Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 08-09-2011 at 06:41 PM.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 09:24 AM   #9
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Thumbs down Re: Pure Stock at divisionals, why not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cicero819 View Post
Why couldn't NHRA allow a new class that could be introduce as Pure Stock. This would allow new blood to be introduce to racing at a divisional level. Pure Stock would what the automobile came with, you race with. I know that many would say that's why we have sportsman in bracket racing but for me it would be a way to introduce new racers(young and old) to our sport, it sure as hell would be better than snowmobiles and Legend cars that NHRA wanted to introduce at divisionals. I just wanted to see, how many felt the same way. Claude Ruel
Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha.................yeah a bunch of FWD cars with fart can mufflers buzzing down the track. They wouldnt cheat as most dont even know how to open a hood !

Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 08-04-2011 at 09:28 AM.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 10:04 AM   #10
Robert Simpson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 808
Likes: 7
Liked 20 Times in 12 Posts
Smile Re: Pure Stock at divisionals, why not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cicero819 View Post
Why couldn't NHRA allow a new class that could be introduce as Pure Stock. This would allow new blood to be introduce to racing at a divisional level. Pure Stock would what the automobile came with, you race with. I know that many would say that's why we have sportsman in bracket racing but for me it would be a way to introduce new racers(young and old) to our sport, it sure as hell would be better than snowmobiles and Legend cars that NHRA wanted to introduce at divisionals. I just wanted to see, how many felt the same way. Claude Ruel
I believe that NHRA should have some pure stock classes. But, only have three or four classes, put a year limit on it 82? and newer American built, RWD cars. Some people want the new FX cars in there own class, I am one of them. But, then the main problem that I see is there is no real tech people anymore that can check the engines under the rules that would be required for the class. I can see it, Unleaded legal gas, full muffler system and DOT drag radials. It could open the market to new companies on a sportsman level. Just a thought.
Robert Simpson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.