|
![]() |
#21 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Alan I wasn't talking down to you. I understand what you guys are going through with the new cars. But as long as these new cars are running them (not in protect mode) they will eventually settle down. This is not new I remember in the 70's you could go buy an Olds wagon. drive it to the track and run further under than our built for stock hemi. We had to run heads up with low factored, mid motored Corvettes.
Last year I laid back a bit because of a promise I made to someone. I have yet to enjoy racing in the "protect" mode. The only thing keeping me racing this year will be the overall class champion stuff. But it looks like that might be just another bunch of lies. If you have to worry about going to fast on a qualifying pass it sucks. I had a lot of fun with my turbo dodges at the points meets till they hit me with the Artie Leong factor. It was no longer fun so I sold the car. I'm sorry you have to worry about going to fast, while knowing you aren't the fastest in the class. To me that would just suck. And I'm not being nasty or sarcastic. But stating how I feel.
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS Last edited by art leong; 03-31-2011 at 07:17 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
Well at least nobody on here has confused "Protect Mode" with "Racing"
Wade Mahaffey Last edited by Wade Mahaffey; 03-31-2011 at 08:14 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: SW Mississippi
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
An index at 330, 660, 1000, &1320 ft. will take care of "protect mode".
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
hell just using that data, and applying a standard deviation to the trap speed and using that in the AHFS would fix a lot
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Veteran Member
|
![]()
Ha! Are you kidding? That is waaaaaaaaaaay too much work for the NHRA! Hell, they won't even factor in the weather! Everything is simply black and white, don't confuse them with the facts! Jim
__________________
Jim Wahl....NHRA #2239 S/SS - IHRA # 8 Stock, D2 Stock Champion (forever I guess) 2019 Baby Gators Stock Champion 2009 NHRA D2 National Open Stock Champion 1982 NHRA D2 West Palm Beach LDRS SS Runner Up Past President, Southern Stock / Super Stock Association. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: lagrange,nc
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Show reaction time , 1/4 mile time & mph only.
And don't put out a qaulifying sheet til after final round qaulifying... And use the hp factor system on 1/8 mile times "if need to be"...... How you like dat ?? Call it D W's get- r - done hp system.
__________________
Danny Waters, Sr / 73 Duster "340" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Sounds good.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
Different cars run the 1/8 mile differently. Even in the same class. High torque cars will do a lot better in the eight. I do agree with taking out the 1000' clocks in eliminations though.
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
They run the 1/8th different, but you won't see tenths different there. Just a few hundreths.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|