|
![]() |
#21 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,485
Likes: 3,587
Liked 7,682 Times in 1,730 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,485
Likes: 3,587
Liked 7,682 Times in 1,730 Posts
|
![]()
Charlie, you could have gotten your point across a whole lot better if you had stopped your comment right there. Mike, his brothers and his dad aren't "pushing the rules" any harder than you, your brother and your dad.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 761
Likes: 16
Liked 632 Times in 88 Posts
|
![]()
Billy you are correct. Everyone is pushing the rules myself included. This is just NHRA's way of getting back at all the racers that have been pushing the rules. Now all the expensive acid ported covered up stuff is worthless. It's all part of playing the game called STOCK.
__________________
Charley Downing 3548 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 241
Likes: 1
Liked 19 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
I have no interest in getting into this with you Charley because #1 I have no idea who you are or what you race and #2 think the idea of the new cars has been beat to death. I was simply trying to say that a 2011 5.0 from the factory would make an awesome B/SA car and if I had the money would do it in an instant because it is a 100% factory-built, production vehicle that you can drive off the lot and that's something that I think is worth being proud of at the end of the day. Go ahead, call me an "assclown" for saying so.
__________________
Mike Ficacci Stk 1010 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 761
Likes: 16
Liked 632 Times in 88 Posts
|
![]()
Mike your not an A$$clown. You actually go to the race track and race. My point is having it rated at 412hp is way to much. The car would weight 3670 in B/SA and it's still only 302 CI. It's not a good combo at 412 HP.
__________________
Charley Downing 3548 STK Last edited by Charley Downing; 03-03-2011 at 01:56 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 241
Likes: 1
Liked 19 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
The stick is a low 12-second car from the factory. Let's not forget that pre-all this craziness, 10.20's were fast in B/S and there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that can't be accomplished with an overhead cam 302 engine. Granted you can't purchase the car, take it to the track and have everyone covered by a half-a-second, but someone who is actually interested in putting in the time and r&d could get that car to fly.
Overhead cams, variable valve timing, lightweight pistons, fully-roller motor, fuel injection? I would love that challenge.
__________________
Mike Ficacci Stk 1010 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
|
![]()
Mike:
There is a proposed new 5.0 Coyote class that may very well happen next year within the NMRA. (heads up format of course) Based very close to Pure Street class build guidelines, I noticed where a Stock Eliminator car could easily fit the rules by swapping in one of those crate engines. The whole idea centers around Ford's 5.0 Coyote crate engine. Guys could put a stock crate 5.0 into any 1979-2012 Mustang and 79-93 Fox bodies....3100 lbs min. Anyway, here is a link to the proposal. I sure hope Ford gets on board with this. ![]() http://www.yellowbullet.com/forum/sh...d.php?t=332505
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 98
Likes: 3
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
What caught my interest was the fact that a Stock Eliminator racer that is very savy with chassis set-up knowledge could do well in this proposed class. There is talk of allowing C-4 transmissions w/brakes but without any weight breaks for the autos. I mentioned in that thread about re-wording the rule regarding tire diameter limits. I would like to see a 28 in. tall tire max...instead of the 26" rule. Lots of guys can tune a 28" setup well, plus it will give more choices for gear selection. I have confidence this class will catch on. However, the problem is how do you prevent it from becoming yet another "run-away wallet" class ?
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 221
Likes: 50
Liked 38 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|