|
10-04-2015, 10:59 PM | #21 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Avon, Indiana
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Merge collectors
I went the fastest in B/A and C/A with merge collectors from the same guy that was building them for Glidden. David ran them as well.
__________________
Scott Wilcox 2193 3x National Champion SS/A, SS/B, SS/K, SS/L, SS/AM, A/SM, C/SM, B/A, C/A, G/A, H/A |
10-04-2015, 11:04 PM | #22 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 1,136
Liked 1,218 Times in 313 Posts
|
Re: Merge collectors
Much as I like and respect Jere, I'm not at all convinced his opinions on steps and merge collectors are completely correct.
In fact, when I pressed Jere a little further, he admitted that step headers were worth some power. Ours are one step, 2" to 2-1/8". They were in fact quicker and faster than the Hooker 2-1/8" headers. Even when the Hookers, which were too big and too short, had a set of Mark's merge collectors on them. Later, after some testing and data crunching, Jere and I discussed a set of two step headers, 1-7/8" to 2" to 2-1/8", and a set of merge collectors. Development on that combination stopped before they were built. Jere's main thoughts on stepped headers, and merge collectors, were for the most part along the lines that few would ever do what was necessary to see what he told me he felt were possible 2-3% gains. As such, he felt for 95% of his customers they were not worth the extra money. The truth is, Jere is probably right. As Billy said, and I agree, for the vast majority of racers, a basic set of single diameter headers with regular collectors, properly sized, will be all they can ever use. They will never do the development necessary to take advantage of anything else. Now, the flip side of that is that 3% on a 650HP engine is almost 20HP. Well worth the upcharge Jere was asking for two step (three diameter) 4 into 1 headers. I spoke at length with Jere's head fabricator, who actually runs the new business, and makes genuine Jere Stahl pattern headers. He told me that he would not make single diameter headers anymore, they would at least be one step, for both performance and ease of fabrication. Odds are, my next set will be built there, and they will be two step, or three diameter headers. They will get a set of merge collectors. I've also talked to Larry Meaux (mostly by email and private message), who developed the PipeMax software that many of us use. Larry said that even some of the most well funded racers, even after seeing what the right size and lengths of primaries and collectors did for their expensive race engines would not spend much more time and money testing cams, and especially not on merge collectors. Larry has in fact expressed the same thing Jere, Billy and I have said. Most racers either cannot or will not do what is necessary to make the higher end headers and collectors work, and will see no gains. Larry has spent a couple of decades on the dyno and the track learning about this stuff, and then writing software to quantify it. I've spoken with Calvin Elston many times, He is a very sharp individual, and a great fabricator who makes a top shelf product. They are absolute automotive artwork, no doubt. That said, his headers are more than twice what Jere was getting for his, and few people would make the effort and spend the money to see the gains they potentially have. A set of 4-2-1 headers requires even more camshaft development than a set of step headers with merge collectors. Calvin quoted me over $3500 for a set 4-5 years ago, and I know it might take 3-4 cams to take full advantage of them. At a bare minimum, that's $1400-$1600 worth of cams, and 2-3 days ($1800) worth of dyno time. For the vast majority of racers, that's just plain out of reach, and out of the question.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
10-05-2015, 12:53 PM | #23 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Detroit,MI
Posts: 77
Likes: 25
Liked 27 Times in 13 Posts
|
Re: Merge collectors
I worked with/at Kromerkraft in the late 90's & early 00's. Everything we built in that era was merge collectors with the tower in the middle to make the flow path more streamlined, occasionally megaphone collectors. Our experience from customer to customer was maybe a max of 0.05 seconds improvement. Generally, 0.02 or 0.03 made for a happy customer. Sometimes what the car wants on the track is not exactly the same as what the dyno wants. One occasion, we had a Super Stock engine builder request two sets of headers, one with 2 steps and one with 3 steps. The dyno liked the 3 step and track liked the 2 step. My guess for the merge collectors is that won't hurt, but may not help. Generally, we found that each customer had to be treated individually for his particular setup.
Last edited by RonP; 10-05-2015 at 12:56 PM. |
10-05-2015, 06:19 PM | #24 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: near Phialdelphia, PA
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Merge collectors
What you'll see on the dyno data, if the headers are over scavenging, is the torque and hp numbers drop while the V/E numbers go up. inconsistent EGT's and BSFC numbers jumping. SS engines are to many different breeds to say if a merge is better, certainly not without the proper cam timing. The PS guys get away with them because their exhaust valves are so small and their ports are fast and efficient.
Frank. |
10-05-2015, 08:24 PM | #25 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 389 Times in 168 Posts
|
Re: Merge collectors
Quote:
No more int/ex split than my cam has ( 4 @ .050"), and I backed the ex lash way off, still nothing. Some run single pattern cams, or "reverse split" cams to make merge collectors work? My heads do have very good exhaust ports. Best I have seen for an SS LT1. I have seen, owned and flowed LT1 heads from a few shops. Was no huge difference between the two most popular. (Have not seen Gulius heads) I have tested all five of my cams. I have bigger & wider, smaller & closer, more split, and the one I keep going back to. Done fuel loops & timing loops on the dyno. So far found nothing. May just be too stinking dumb. Likely so. Got two more races till I'm done anyway. Through looking for more. Trying to watch the average for the other guys these last two.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
|
10-06-2015, 01:15 PM | #26 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: northern Minnesota
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Merge collectors
We set a national record with a set of Hedman step headers on 302 ford. The pipes were 1 1/2 to 1 5/8 step. You can't use there collectors as they are no good for a race car. The collectors we used were made by Headers by ED of Minneapolis MN. He doesn't use a merge type of collector but uses his own style that seems to work just as well. And it is a lot easier to make. Ed no longer makes complete pieces, but has every thing you need to make your own. Now day there is a lot of satisfaction in doing your own stuff. Eds collectors when we finished them were 2 3/8 minor od 2 1/2 major od. One last thing. I talked at length with the late great Jack Davis of Hooker and Davis headers about design. Of all the information he shared with me, one thing he said was about testing. He felt headers had to be tested at the track not on a dyno. Hope this helps and happy motoring.
|
10-11-2015, 03:21 PM | #27 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Merge collectors
A friend told me that this thread was getting some attention so I thought I might put in my 2 cents.
IMO, I have never seen a exhaust port that was smaller than it needed to be. If you can change say header tube size or step length, or no-step to two step, or collector diameter or length or 421 to 4into1, and not see any difference your motor is not sensitive to what kind of a header it has on it. Another way of saying that is your header is not working to add anything to the way the engine runs, is it? It is certainly possible that whether you buy headers that come in a box or made for you custom, if the above is the case, it is not simply the fault of the header, ok? If you do not want to change things in the motor so you can gain the extra power available from the exhaust system, then keep bracket racing and praying you don't have to run heads up with someone who does. |
10-11-2015, 04:42 PM | #28 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,332
Likes: 3,340
Liked 7,207 Times in 1,612 Posts
|
Re: Merge collectors
Quote:
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm OK..........it's everybody else. |
|
10-11-2015, 05:07 PM | #29 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Merge collectors
Quote:
Every once in a while I will get a spec on how a builder wants a header for his engine. All I have to do is ask a few questions and they will admit they really have no idea outside of their dyno header. So I am asked to figure it out for him or "whatever" I think. So now I am responsible for making his engine run better. Seems most racers know there is something there but few answers... |
|
10-11-2015, 05:21 PM | #30 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 1,136
Liked 1,218 Times in 313 Posts
|
Re: Merge collectors
Quote:
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
|
|