|
02-12-2014, 04:31 PM | #11 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 1,655
Likes: 8
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
|
Re: 1969 camaro hood
Not likely NHRA took this upon themselves for no particular reason...likely a building chorus of complaints.
__________________
Rich Taylor I/SA - 321 |
02-12-2014, 05:46 PM | #12 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 34
Likes: 48
Liked 12 Times in 4 Posts
|
Re: 1969 camaro hood
How about all the wrong hoods they allow on the Mopars? AAR hoods on wrong Cudas. TA hoods on wrong Challengers. Hemi scoop hood on a 66 Belvedere.
|
02-12-2014, 06:07 PM | #13 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
|
Re: 1969 camaro hood
I rest my case.... Attack one brand and allow some others to beat the rules, today. Later attack or punish another group and agitate them.
|
02-12-2014, 06:18 PM | #14 | |
Live Reporter
|
Re: 1969 camaro hood
Quote:
__________________
Jack Matyas 1547 FS/C 2015 Camaro COPO # 62- 2012 Camaro Convertible COPO |
|
02-12-2014, 06:20 PM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pottstown,Pa.
Posts: 121
Likes: 24
Liked 11 Times in 8 Posts
|
Re: 1969 camaro hood
You don't have to get me started on how NHRA has affected my finances and race program .
|
02-12-2014, 07:10 PM | #16 |
Member
|
Re: 1969 camaro hood
i feel everybody's pain on the hood issue.they let the 68 to 71 big block corvette's run the L88 HOOD for years and then they took them away becuase of one racer that could not outrun a 69 big block corvette.with all of the bogus chrysler and ford hoods out there and then they do this it is just wrong!!! i guess all the 396-375 hp camaros are next.
|
02-13-2014, 01:35 PM | #17 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Fife, Washington
Posts: 1,859
Likes: 1,855
Liked 2,295 Times in 610 Posts
|
Re: 1969 camaro hood
Quote:
Thanks for the info. I figured there might be a slight difference due to design. It is surprising how much stuff is allowed on a STOCKER these days. I underdstand some of the changes, but many of the cars are so far from stock it is just wrong. I had a stocker briefly back in the 70's. I am still a big fan of the class and super stockers also, but shake my head at some of the cars that are running now. Pacific Raceways has 4 stock super stock combo races this year and I will be there for them all. I hope that the class will still be around for many more years. I have many friends that race in both stock and super stock and I applaud there efforts, in spite of what NHRA keeps throwing at them.
__________________
Ron McDowell - Did Race Every day is a Gift - Enjoy with family and friends. |
|
02-13-2014, 09:12 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 667
Likes: 30
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: 1969 camaro hood
If the cowl hood didn't come on it it shouldn't be on it. What about the rear wings that aren't on the cars that came with wings on them?
__________________
Kris Rachford 69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed C/S 3032 |
02-14-2014, 12:27 PM | #19 |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Spotsylvania,Va
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: 1969 camaro hood
|
02-14-2014, 12:35 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 667
Likes: 30
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: 1969 camaro hood
What I'm saying is if that engine/hp combo didn't have the option for a cowl hood then how can you run it? With that being said I think its funny how pretty much every 67-69 F-body stocker does not run a rear wing yet 95% of the ones that were ever on the street had them. I'm not a F-body guru and I'm sure the reason they get away with that is GM had the rear wings as an option but was that rear wing an option on cars that had Cowl hoods or was it part of the package?
__________________
Kris Rachford 69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed C/S 3032 |
|
|