HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-04-2013, 04:46 AM   #11
Michael Colaluca
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Speaking of Fuels

I know the brand Rocket Fuel was lots cheaper than VP and Sonoco a few years back. Not sure if they are around anymore
Michael Colaluca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 10:40 AM   #12
njk53
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East China, MI
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Speaking of Fuels

We have used both the Sunoco and VP fuels. VP may be marginally better but not significant enough to justfy the higher cost of VP.

Either fuel at a 105 octane rating is overkill for our 9:1 motor. It would be nice if the NHRA would allow VP, Sunoco, Rocket, et al to provide a fuel that is 100 octane and 95 octane that is easily checked by the NHRA.
All I am looking for is to use a fuel that will help our car run better.

Does anyone know what the fuel inspector is looking for at fuel check? Specific Gravity? Purity of the Fuel? Other elements?
__________________
Nelson Kowal
Stock 345
njk53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 01:26 PM   #13
kdanner
Member
 
kdanner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 221
Likes: 50
Liked 38 Times in 17 Posts
Default Re: Speaking of Fuels

Quote:
Originally Posted by njk53 View Post
We have used both the Sunoco and VP fuels. VP may be marginally better but not significant enough to justfy the higher cost of VP.

Either fuel at a 105 octane rating is overkill for our 9:1 motor. It would be nice if the NHRA would allow VP, Sunoco, Rocket, et al to provide a fuel that is 100 octane and 95 octane that is easily checked by the NHRA.
All I am looking for is to use a fuel that will help our car run better.

Does anyone know what the fuel inspector is looking for at fuel check? Specific Gravity? Purity of the Fuel? Other elements?
C9 is 92 MON, C10 is 96. Any reason those won't work for you?
kdanner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 04:54 PM   #14
Dennis P Chapman
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toms River NJ
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 419
Liked 53 Times in 25 Posts
Default Re: Speaking of Fuels

Quote:
Originally Posted by kdanner View Post
C9 is 92 MON, C10 is 96. Any reason those won't work for you?
C10 is unleaded but works good.
__________________
Dennis P Chapman 1904 STK
NHRA National Record Holder Car Owner.
Dennis P Chapman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 07:53 PM   #15
west coast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rainy Washington
Posts: 609
Likes: 12
Liked 223 Times in 73 Posts
Default Re: Speaking of Fuels

I run C10 in my foxbody stocker, got 5 gallons of C9 at the end of the season have not open it yet to try. but will at the first time I head to the track. I dont have a price on it yet dont know if it is any cheaper than C10. the lower octane should help. Both of these fuels are unleaded.
west coast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2013, 09:30 PM   #16
Ed Carpenter
Live Reporter
 
Ed Carpenter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dripping Springs, Tx
Posts: 2,709
Likes: 186
Liked 520 Times in 132 Posts
Default Re: Speaking of Fuels

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Marconette View Post
Sunoco 110 (Purple) is by far cheaper than similar VP fuels. It is on the approved list.

Sean
This past weekend I paid 42.50 for 5 gallons of Sunoco purple and 67.00 for 5 gallons of VP C11. Total ripoff.
__________________
Ed Carpenter
2005 Chevy Cobalt A/SM
Race Engine Development
Ed Carpenter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2013, 10:01 PM   #17
Michael Colaluca
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Speaking of Fuels

I remember the old man Heffler pushing rocket fuel at me a couple of years ago. Said he got the same performance as when he ran VP C11. Figure I will find some and give it a go. Just got to find someone who sells it in the Dallas area
Michael Colaluca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2013, 10:14 PM   #18
Bob Bender
VIP Member
 
Bob Bender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 1,599
Liked 460 Times in 91 Posts
Default Re: Speaking of Fuels

Y
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Colaluca View Post
I remember the old man Heffler pushing rocket fuel at me a couple of years ago. Said he got the same performance as when he ran VP C11. Figure I will find some and give it a go. Just got to find someone who sells it in the Dallas area
The rocket 111 was great in my wagon. Cant buy it in Maryland anymore.
__________________
Bob Bender 144 O/SA
2010-2012 National Record Holder
Bob Bender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2013, 10:30 PM   #19
7423
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Speaking of Fuels

I am going to try Rockett 111 at our upcoming Vegas points meet. I am very tired of paying waaaaaaaaaay too much for VP.
7423 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2013, 11:11 PM   #20
Darrin Christen
Member
 
Darrin Christen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Des Allemands, LA
Posts: 365
Likes: 8
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Speaking of Fuels

Quote:
Originally Posted by deuces wild View Post
This past weekend I paid 42.50 for 5 gallons of Sunoco purple and 67.00 for 5 gallons of VP C11. Total ripoff.
Hey Ed, which made more power?
__________________
4878 SS/GA 66CHEVY II
Darrin Christen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.