Wow !! Sonoma stock !!!

[BlueOval Ralph]

You could make a case to Yes on both count's beyond a resonable doubt!
As it was said before "The question is, "Is NHRA just incompetent or corrupt?"

[X-TECH MAN]

Originally Posted by blueoval ralph

you could make a case to yes on both count's beyond a resonable doubt!
As it was said before "the question is, "is nhra just incompetent or corrupt?"

both !

[Bob Mulry]

I also have more good news.............

That the 2010 Mustang Coupe352ci 285/295 NHRA HP is a natural F/SA car.............

Soooooooooooooo he can run E/SA, F/SA & G/SA........

The 2010 Mustang Convertable 352ci 285/295 NHRA HP is a natural G/SA car .............

Soooooooooooooo he can run F/SA, G/SA & H/SA........

Even Ray Charles can see that this combo is a joke.............

Bob

[Ed Wright]

Sad!

[Comp 798]

Thanks to Chris Holbrook for an awesome motor.

I built my car from a brand new 2010 5spd. V6 "donor" car. It went directly to the shop from the dealership and took me about 11 months working full time and spending 2-3 days per week on the car to complete it.

On the scales at Infinion I was 3225. 3120 is E/SA. If all the timing was in and I let it leave the starting line when we had 700' of air, it would go 10.0's

[The Hawk]

Originally Posted by Bob Mulry

I also have more good news.............

That the 2010 Mustang Coupe352ci 285/295 NHRA HP is a natural F/SA car.............

Soooooooooooooo he can run E/SA, F/SA & G/SA........

The 2010 Mustang Convertable 352ci 285/295 NHRA HP is a natural G/SA car .............

Soooooooooooooo he can run F/SA, G/SA & H/SA........

Even Ray Charles can see that this combo is a joke.............

Bob

What a complete joke. NHRA only puts 10 HP on that small block combo,and my `78 V6 has 25 on it,and its carburated!

[bigshow2966]

Originally Posted by A56

Im not impressed with the times one bit on the 352" mustang at all, nor any of the new cars for that matter. The combo is as bogus as can be, a true slap in the face by NHRA and Ford to us Stock Eliminator Racers, just as all the new Ford and Mopar combinations have been. I have no problem with the new cars being introduced into Stock Eliminator, I would welcome them with open arms, But NHRA , Ford, Mopar, please just simple do the basic math and put a correct horsepower factor on them to begin with. It amazes me that our old cars were built with 40 year old technology, by the same manufacturers, and they are rated basicly the same as the new cars. If this all is true and correct Ford, Mopar, Chevrolet, and us as Men, in due time should be walking on our feet and hands like Cavemen. I have zero respect for any man that kicks people while there on the floor, that hits there children, that feels there a better person than another, or that cant simply put the correct factor on a modern competition engine.

Mark Lelchook
E/SA #704

You guys seem to forget that your "40 year old" technology kicked a lot of people to the curb when it was introduced. A lot of that technology has been allowed "enhancements" through the years too.


Mustang was low qualifier and out 2nd round of eliminations on a break-out. Not that hard to break a guy out and get rid of him when he's sandbagging that much, is it?

[Jared Jordan]

Maybe not, but what happens if Mark Lelchook (or any other E/SA for that matter...) draws the Mustang heads-up? Mark's car is really fast for E/SA, but it's going to look foolish when he's 3/4 of a second behind. Just because it didn't happen doesn't mean there's no reason to complain.

[Ed Wright]

Agreed!

[Mickey Whaley]

Originally Posted by bigshow2966

You guys seem to forget that your "40 year old" technology kicked a lot of people to the curb when it was introduced. A lot of that technology has been allowed "enhancements" through the years too.


Mustang was low qualifier and out 2nd round of eliminations on a break-out. Not that hard to break a guy out and get rid of him when he's sandbagging that much, is it?

what if he had a heads up second round?