HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-22-2010, 10:39 PM   #11
Bobby Bennett
Junior Member
 
Bobby Bennett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: An Idea for the Future

So, am I to assume you guys believe there's merit in a pre-1970s rule for those 3 Modified classifications?
Bobby Bennett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2010, 11:41 PM   #12
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: An Idea for the Future

Bobby, as an automotive journalist why don't you try and get an interview with Gracia,Bruce and Graham Light about these new cars?And ask them the tough questions being addressed on Class Racer?
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 06:56 AM   #13
BlueOval Ralph
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: An Idea for the Future

The car count in those classes is so small, it just doesn't mater to the masses, only to those building a new car, right Bobby?? The more important fight is fixing the big picture items like CJ & DP classes.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby Bennett View Post
So, am I to assume you guys believe there's merit in a pre-1970s rule for those 3 Modified classifications?
BlueOval Ralph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 07:51 AM   #14
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: An Idea for the Future

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueOval Ralph View Post
The car count in those classes is so small, it just doesn't mater to the masses, only to those building a new car, right Bobby?? The more important fight is fixing the big picture items like CJ & DP classes.
I agree.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 09:27 PM   #15
Steve Williams
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: An Idea for the Future

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Wright View Post
Were you actually racing in the late 1970s, 1980s? Where were these 32 & 64 car shows? The WCS races were all run, national events were all class winners. Comp Eliminator today is not the Comp of those days. Mostly Econo dragsters back then.
Thinking maybe the car count fell off drastically after I quit at the end of the 1979 season when Modified greatly out numbered Comp. So after reading your " rant" I emailed Bill Long, Mike Edward's partner when he was running B/SM with his Maverick. Bill says Modified greatly out numbered Comp right up to the end. I'll take his word since I know for certain they were there. Modified Eliminator World Champs, right?
Sorry Ed,

I may have misled you in some areas of this topic. I don't dispute the large turnouts for Modified. You convey an idea that Comp had no turnout and that was not the case at all. Comp was strong back then and not so much currently. Econo dragsters were plentiful, but then again I believe they were out numbered by altereds. Edwards was the Champ, the last Champ and there is no dispute there. It was the same situation then as it is now concerning car counts if comparing SS to Comp. It only makes sense that Comp does not have the counts as it is terribly expensive to run one of these cars competitively as compared to most SS cars. Although there are a few operations out there currently that are spending Comp money to race SS. That makes no sense to me. Comp never qualified off class winners and I never remember an all run situation. Stock&Super Stock all run I agree with that, Comp was not that way in the late seventies. I will say that I read Phil Burgess' article about Modified's demise and was wondering where he got his facts about car counts. The only division that was weak was Div 6. I remember that at the Fall nationals there were more Div 1,2,3,4,5 cars than there were Div 6&7 combined. Ed, about driving back in the 70's-I would if I could have but as a 15 year old that didn't have two nickels to rub together it became apparent that that would have to wait. Now I got the nickels to run Comp but the currency changed to big dollars (it may never happen for me on my own). Atleast it didn't deter me from building an affordable stocker. One last point that I want to make. Modified did not have to be axed. It was healthy as were all sportsman classes at that time. But on a side note, they bring in more SG and SC cars now than Modified and Comp combined did back then. This axing of Modified made NHRA alot of money and put many people in business selling electronics that a rocket scientist marvels at. It also cost alot of guys alot of money on cars that were not worth .50 cents on the dollar. I worry that at some point that this will happen again to some class and we will write and talk about what a travesty it is but have no voice with the sanctioning body. It's all good isn't it? History could repeat itself.
Steve Williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 09:41 PM   #16
Sean Kennedy
Member
 
Sean Kennedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to Sean Kennedy
Default Re: An Idea for the Future

Does somebody have a copy of Modified Eliminator rules?

Or at least, since I'm too young to have been around for modified, the difference between modified and comp.
__________________
2002 Division 6 High School Champion
2007 Division 6 Pro Champion
2007 Division 6 National Open Series Stock/Super Stock Champion
Sean Kennedy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 10:41 PM   #17
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: An Idea for the Future

I don't know where you're from, but in Div 4 we always had many more Modifieds than Comp, which was mostly econo dragsters, not all that many altereds. All ran at div races, paired off qualifying just like Stock, SS and Comp right now. Could be that we never had enough Comp cars for a full field, but everybody ran. I was not a 15 year old kid watching, I was about 25 years old and running a C/SM Camaro in Modified.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2010, 09:14 AM   #18
Steve Williams
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: An Idea for the Future

Ed,

Talked to a old Comp racer and he tells me that he thought that all run in Comp ended around 1979 (maybe 78) but no later than 1980. He also said that his opinion of why cars counts dropped in Comp was due to escalating expenses (cylinder heads primarily). You are correct about Div 4 having alot of Modified cars, much more than Comp. Same scenario in Div 3. I don't remember your C/SM Camaro, but they were a popular combination as I remember seeing many of them. The idea of classes for updated older vehicles is appealing I am sure to many people.
Steve Williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2010, 09:30 AM   #19
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 712
Liked 1,575 Times in 580 Posts
Default Re: An Idea for the Future

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Williams View Post
Ed,

Talked to a old Comp racer and he tells me that he thought that all run in Comp ended around 1979 (maybe 78) but no later than 1980. He also said that his opinion of why cars counts dropped in Comp was due to escalating expenses (cylinder heads primarily). You are correct about Div 4 having alot of Modified cars, much more than Comp. Same scenario in Div 3. I don't remember your C/SM Camaro, but they were a popular combination as I remember seeing many of them. The idea of classes for updated older vehicles is appealing I am sure to many people.
Comp Eliminator evolved in the same way as Stock and Super Stock. Today's Comp cars have a lot of the Pro Stock chassis and engine technology that makes it a very expensive class to run. I still remember when Super Modified were limited to the original suspension and the trick was to use the leaf-link system. They were also limited to a 10.5" rear tire.
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2010, 11:24 AM   #20
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: An Idea for the Future

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Williams View Post
Ed,

Talked to a old Comp racer and he tells me that he thought that all run in Comp ended around 1979 (maybe 78) but no later than 1980. He also said that his opinion of why cars counts dropped in Comp was due to escalating expenses (cylinder heads primarily). You are correct about Div 4 having alot of Modified cars, much more than Comp. Same scenario in Div 3. I don't remember your C/SM Camaro, but they were a popular combination as I remember seeing many of them. The idea of classes for updated older vehicles is appealing I am sure to many people.
Comp was still all run, same as Modified, when I quit at the end of 1979. The econo dragsters had the same heads and engines as super modifieds.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.