|
![]() |
#11 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I also agree on the first round on Saturday for S/ST.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: erie ill
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
i also agree 1st round sst on saturday
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Waxahachie, Texas
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Rock,
I am not in D3, but lets get rid of the 10.90 rule, and I hope in my division we can start running R1 on Saturday's? Thanks for starting this thread "Rock". ![]() Bighead |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Several years ago I had a dragster with front brakes for static burnouts. I had a handle for the front brakes which made it great for unloading. They bounced me in tech at Pomona for a secondary braking system. I had to disable before they would pass me. Really dumb rule. (thanks John Force)
__________________
MDS Motorsports |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Waukegan il
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
1st rd for super street on saturday and allowing s/st drivers to race in a second class
Last edited by Joe Fuesting; 07-06-2010 at 11:22 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Happy Valley, OR
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
How about lowering the weight limit for S/ST down to 2500 or 2400? As it was explained to me at the time by an NHRA official, the increase from 2500 to 2800 was to minimize the RT advantage of tube chassis cars back when they were on a 0.400 pro tree. Now that the tree is 0.500 it would probably be in everyone's best interest to not have 300 or 400 lbs of ballast on these 150+ mph S/ST cars...
__________________
Michael Pliska 643 S/G |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ottawa, OH
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Damien Hazelton Lucky Dog Racing |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fayetteville Ohio
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Some aren't to far from that now !
Glad to see Joe changed Sun to Sat on first round for s/st Last edited by Bob Verwold; 07-06-2010 at 02:52 PM. Reason: add |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Wadsworth, Ohio
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I would like to see anything done that would shorten Sunday and get us home earlier.
I would like to see the hand brake rule removed, I had it installed on my new American as a safety item. Thanks Rock, BB |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Milford, MI
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Rock,
as one of the unlucky souls that (generally, uncompetitively) races an overweight, mostly steel Chevy II in SG because I want also to run SC, I'd support the recommendation from Alex and others to drop the "one class" rule for S/ST... I might have a chance to move from a 3-digit to a 2-digit reaction time in that case... I don't, however, think it makes sense to invite more true (i.e., lightweight, tube chassis) SG cars to run in S/ST by lowering the min weight for S/ST. Need to give the little guys a chance to run without being 25-30mph slower on the top end than their competitor (like I am today in SG...). Also allows the local racer to run their bracket beater at a divisional event when the show is in town. See you in Stanton. srm |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|