|
![]() |
#121 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Same as you, I don't have car. I'm just a keyboard jockey with an opinion, whats your excuse.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#122 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]()
Oh, but I do have a car and may back out this year after bad luck last year. You on the other hand..not so much.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#123 | |
Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 139
Likes: 2
Liked 66 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Tom, Keyboard racer or not it looks like you do your homework on the specs. Not to many people do that, thank you! Jim D'Amore |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#124 |
Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 139
Likes: 2
Liked 66 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]()
http://nhraracer.com/content/general...342&zoneid=132
The link above takes you to NHRARacer website where it shows the 5.4L 4.0L combination was on the books for 2010 and 2012 engine combos approved for the showdown class. It was then removed by Mike D. after a few weeks. kdanner, it's plain and simple any time the HP in stock eliminator got above 500 HP both of those combinations became legal. The 2013 Cobra Jet came from the factory with 500 HP. By the end of the year it was already above 525 HP. So both of those engine combinations were legal in 2013. Jim D'Amore |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#125 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,667
Likes: 1,960
Liked 10,838 Times in 2,253 Posts
|
![]()
It's NHRA's ball, bat , glove, and field!
Play Ball |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#126 | |
Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 139
Likes: 2
Liked 66 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]()
I will be making several posts through out the day, then it will be up to Ken and the members of Class Racer to decide if they would like to have this thread locked up. It's going to start now...
Poking the bear came from Mike's mouth when I started pushing back. Quote:
that post was made 11-07-2017 A few short weeks after that Mike pulled Ford's 10 year sponsorship from Classracer.com. When I questioned Mike during our 3 hr meeting in Norwalk, OH a couple of weeks ago his exact words to me were he did not like the way he was being treated because of my post above. It showed he took it personal rather than thinking of what is good for Ford Motor Company and the members of Classracer.com. He was trying to hurt the site financially because of his personal feelings. Yet he continues to post about his stock/superstock association GLSSA. He receives financial gains from the GLSSA. First off my apologies were given to Ken M. for losing his Ford sponsorship because of my post. I've known Ken since 1999 when he started writing for the biggest Ford Magazine on the planet (Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords.) He worked with MMFF for 15 years and in that time I've always known Ken to be one of Ford's biggest cheerleaders! Besides buying a new Ford vehicle every other year and racing an older Shelby Stocker for many years, he decided a few years back he was going to do what he needed to get in a new Cobra Jet. He worked out a deal with a fellow racer to purchase one of his 08' Cobra Jets and make payments on it so he could start racing stock while show casing Ford's best, the Cobra Jet. That is Ken's passion for Ford and because Mike got his personal feelings hurt he trampled on the dreams of a loyal, life long, Ford enthusiast. My guess is if Ken was racing a Mopar, classracer would still have a Ford Sponsorship. These are nothing but the facts, Jim D'Amore |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#127 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#128 |
Member
|
![]()
Even if the engine is less capable it has a supercharger that is one liter bigger than anyone else...
If you want to talk about folks that took it in the rear, take a look at the N/A Shootout guys (All brands). I know of 5 other people as well as myself that built an N/A combo had it ready to race and they killed the class for blower only cars. Not to mention all the players that had established setups. I promise Bo had 100's of Thousands into his combo. He said in the Cobra jet video (On YouTube) he got a new engine each race, from his builder a few days before the race. Unfortunately we are like kids dealing with our parents, when racing. Just because they said it was "OK" for a split second but then changed their mind, we are stuck with the final decision. As upset as we get it’s their rules and it’s not changing unless they want it to.
__________________
Ross Gregory 5133 Stock,Super Stock 53 Top Dragster |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#129 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Blower size is a mute point. copo's have a smaller pulley on there 2.9 then anybody else and have a bigger cam lift. Mopars have a engine that does not even bolt into a stock challenger. The all have there own plus and minus. The combo is in the guide and looks to be equal to the others. This issue has nothing to do with nhra, they are okay with it, ford is not. Thats all it is about, why did ford tell nhra not to let it compete. What ever the answers is I think many would like to here it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#130 | |
Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 139
Likes: 2
Liked 66 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Question, was it the manufacturers that turned away the N/A shoot out cars or was it NHRA? Because NHRA has been fantastic in working with the racers on the Supercharged cars. In fact they have gone above and beyond on many occasions to make it so all Supercharged cars and their drag racing customers will fit in this class. GM has just done a better job than Ford. Mopar, hell they are just toying with us they are so good. As far as the displacement difference in Superchargers, if the 2.9L and 4.0L were similar in design it would be an advantage. But the 4.0L has a rear entry, making 2 90* turns before the air hits the rotor packs. The design of the rotor packs are not the Gen 3 technology like the 2.9L. There is a 35+ HP difference between the old design and the Gen 3 rotors. There is a 40 HP difference in the rear entry vs. front entry case design. Because the 4.0L rotor packs are so much larger and heavier it takes an additional 22 HP to turn over the new Gen 3 2.9L rotors. The biggest factor is you are talking a 4.00" diameter pulley vs. a 3.00" pulley so the 4.0L blower turns at 8,000 RPM slower than the new 2.9L Gen 3. Advantage goes to the 2.9L Gen 3. Size does matter in some things, but efficiency matters most in this case. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|