|
|
View Poll Results: Yay or Nay | |||
This is a net good |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
86 | 43.88% |
This is a net bad |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
52 | 26.53% |
Don't care, I'm going to stay in my lane |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
58 | 29.59% |
Voters: 196. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 22
Likes: 148
Liked 57 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Daren, thank you for the response to my question. I think what you are doing in terms of adding an exciting new car/combination to Stock Eliminator is a good thing and your hard work should be commended. However, one does not have to look back too far to see the results of what I believe is over generous NHRA HP ratings related to new cars/combinations. For example, 2010 INDY; 11 of the top 16 qualifiers were 2008-2010 entries. 2011 INDY; all top 16 qualifiers were 2008-2011 entries. In my opinion, new cars/combinations in Stock Eliminator should be competitive, but they should not be dominating classes full of previous top qualifiers that have been flogging out there combinations for the past 20+ years. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 103
Likes: 7
Liked 93 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]()
When classified by hp vs weight, body aerodynamics can be an advantage, old vs new.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 | |||
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 2,201
Liked 2,364 Times in 560 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 Last edited by GUMP; 06-23-2025 at 02:06 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|