|
12-20-2022, 08:12 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 199
Likes: 47
Liked 68 Times in 22 Posts
|
65-85 under.
I know that runs under 65 under will no longer be counted in class averages but what does over 84.9 under get you?
|
12-20-2022, 09:31 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Jersey
Posts: 188
Likes: 175
Liked 782 Times in 152 Posts
|
Re: 65-85 under.
If you were to trigger your combinations enough times for it to qualify for a "review" at the end of the year, there will be a horsepower increase if your average is faster than .849 under the index.
__________________
1189 F/SA Defunzalo Racing Enterprises |
12-20-2022, 09:36 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 199
Likes: 47
Liked 68 Times in 22 Posts
|
Re: 65-85 under.
Well that sucks. Am I correct in assuming lots of people will be running slower than they used to on purpose?
|
Liked |
12-20-2022, 09:53 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 199
Likes: 47
Liked 68 Times in 22 Posts
|
Re: 65-85 under.
How many runs over 84.9 under trigger a review?
|
12-20-2022, 10:34 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Monroe Twp NJ
Posts: 469
Likes: 976
Liked 948 Times in 250 Posts
|
Re: 65-85 under.
none, it has to be 2 of 1.00 or more, until it gets to 1.300
__________________
Duane Hoven 1342 SS/GT |
12-20-2022, 10:59 PM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Indianola Washington
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Liked 426 Times in 134 Posts
|
Re: 65-85 under.
Quote:
Calling Stock Eliminator a performance class is in question with these changes. Steve Teeter Stk/SS 620 |
|
Liked |
12-21-2022, 08:34 AM | #7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 3,337
Liked 7,198 Times in 1,610 Posts
|
Re: 65-85 under.
Calling Stock Eliminator "Stock Eliminator" is in question also with all of the changes.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm OK..........it's everybody else. |
12-21-2022, 09:05 AM | #8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,680
Likes: 1,763
Liked 1,767 Times in 430 Posts
|
Re: 65-85 under.
Alas, it's all we have!
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 |
Liked |
12-21-2022, 09:37 AM | #9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 558
Liked 1,702 Times in 520 Posts
|
Re: 65-85 under.
lots of racers have been asking for the AHFS to be changed. Now there is a change. You can still run as fast as you want. You just have to pay the price with a HP hit if you go too fast. I think this is a better situation than lowering the indexes across the board again. I am not sure why the runs under .65 do not count toward the average. All runs except aborted or incomplete runs should be counted.
People complain all the time about 1000 ft racing. Run your cars all out and take the hit and then you can run the full 1/4 mile. Might take a few hits for some combos. People have been playing the game so long that they have gotten used to it as the norm.
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS |
12-21-2022, 10:20 AM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Indianola Washington
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Liked 426 Times in 134 Posts
|
Re: 65-85 under.
So work on your combo , spend more $ to run faster and get a HP hit for your hard work and lighter wallet? The logic does not work. Why would any one do
this? Yes the rules have gotten out of hand with what Stock was originally about but there the current rules. Change them to what everyone thinks is best then hire qualified tech inspectors to enforce rules, but Penalizing HP because of your NHRA rules is not the best way to equalize the playing field. (If that's NHRAs goal here). I would be in favor of a personal index adjustment in heads up situations to level the field. Steve Teeter Stk/SS 620 |
Liked |
|
|