|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Liked 18 Times in 8 Posts
|
![]()
Sorry, double post
Last edited by Wade Mahaffey; 04-03-2017 at 10:37 PM. Reason: double post |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Liked 18 Times in 8 Posts
|
![]()
Now I don't have a dog in the fight, but I do have a puppy that I'm growing to be in the fight. I will be just a rookie in the Super/Stock thing, but it seems to me that one of the main issues of the NHRA folks, is they won't run IHRA because of the policing of the class rules on cars. Now it seems that NHRA is slipping down to IHRA tear down status. Does that mean that some will now come over to IHRA?
Check this out: And second, why couldn't they "tech mark" engine components, to be checked later on the winners of heads up runs only in the eliminator. They could do that on a case by case basis. In other words, If a race was decided by something other than horsepower (where both cars ran full to the stripe), i.e. red light, cross the center line, obviously spun the tire, etc. in which case a car would not be marked because the run was obviously compromised, and not due to one car being faster. Now, if the two cars had a good pass together, the loser could wave the marking should they desire. But if the loser wanted the car marked, and then torn down and checked at the end of the day... should the winner be illegal, then the loser of the heads up run must be checked in the same way... and if found to be in compliance.... the original winner of the heads up that was dirty pays 5K to the loser, who after all... should have continued in eliminations, but was pushed out by an illegal entry. If the loser was dirty in the same way as the dirty winner, the winner pays nothing, and both are checked before the next race. If there's no heads up runs, the barn stays empty. Because it's a dial in race at that point anyway. Cheaters would think twice about it, if it would cost them 5K if caught out of compliance by NHRA rules. And the loser would think twice before protesting the winner, because he would have to come down as well, should the winner be dirty....to be declared legal and claim the 5K Wade Mahaffey |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dripping Springs, Tx
Posts: 2,709
Likes: 186
Liked 520 Times in 132 Posts
|
![]()
When we first started in SS in 2007 cars got torn down all the time. Slowly it has dwindled to nada at divisional events.........In the fall were gonna try to set the SS/H record. I'm assuming well.be torn down......😉
__________________
Ed Carpenter 2005 Chevy Cobalt A/SM Race Engine Development |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: lakewood, co
Posts: 558
Likes: 302
Liked 147 Times in 54 Posts
|
![]()
lmfao ....
__________________
Randy Hyman. Lakewood co. stk 5394 P/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Federal Way, WA
Posts: 238
Likes: 38
Liked 160 Times in 51 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Brian Thompson NHRA Stock / Super Stock Class P/SA 6665 SS/MA 6665 Last edited by fordteacherguy; 03-23-2017 at 08:20 AM. Reason: Add comment |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 901
Likes: 1,713
Liked 405 Times in 158 Posts
|
![]()
Started a long post and realised I was parroting what fordteacherguy said.
So, to recap; 1) ALL WINNERS UNDERGO TECHNICAL INSPECTION 2) "what happens if they don't pass?" rule changes 3) I would rather tear my car down at the end of the race and load it up and put it together at home I think nhra has thrown up their hands and won't do tear downs unless another racer protests. The benefit for nhra is bare minimal cost to tech, no cost to police the class. Basically show up with your cars to run your little race during our race weekend with your own tech or whatever it is you class guys do. Don't bother us, just feed us $$ for using the track. I remember seeing clippings of old nhra races (50-60's) where the winner was deemed illegal and lost the trophy so it wouldn't be the first time this has been done. Sliding more towards the "factory appearing" racing then tight ruled class racing..... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 252
Likes: 6
Liked 23 Times in 13 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Frank Bialas 1570 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: lakewood, co
Posts: 558
Likes: 302
Liked 147 Times in 54 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
state of things. I do not see you comment real often. When you do it is thought out, worth while and intelligent. Kinda goes with out saying for a guy who is bumping 100 national event wins. Makes me sad and depressed. Oddly enough I feel kind of blessed I was torn down in Topeka kansas nearly 20 years ago when teardowns were not unusual. With the help of friend and stock legend Bob Shaw I passed and got the car put back together succesfully. Felt good about being found legit. Also set a few national records, torn down with help from other friends as well. Now wondering do they even weigh or check fuel....??
__________________
Randy Hyman. Lakewood co. stk 5394 P/SA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|