NHRA regulates off track behavior.........

[E MAN 1982]

This thread is being monitored and all 'HATERS' will be dealt with!! E

[Dan Fahey]

Originally Posted by John Kelley

How can you compare PINKS with STREET RACING ???
There is no compasrison.......

YOU MISSED my point by a MILE !!

My point:
The Sanctioning bodies have a opportunity to capitalize on this !
Put on a Street Racing program that was as interesting as PINKS..
Do not know why PINKS stopped. Sure had my attention.

IHRA and NHRA need to get out of the box of the sanctioned professional and amateur and deal with the serious issue of Street Racing.

One of the major prejudices are allowing foreign makes to race with US built cars.
Hell that alone in Stock would double the ranks.

Provide a venue and intrigue.
If it were me I know what I would do.

D

[Dan Fahey]

One interesting point...

I remember Georgia 400 getting built back in the 70's

Deliverance and Smokey and the Bandit were filmed in that area.
Burt Reynolds used a lot of that road before it was completed for his street racing themes in the Bandit series.

Street Outlaws, Fast and Furious, Bullet were all about competition and the baddest ***** cars and crazy souls going after it.

I get the feeling more people were watching Street Outlaws than were going to NHRA Meets.

I think Pro Stock has run its course and why Mountain Motor and other venues are run by the street guys.

Street Outlaws have a small tire and large tire cars racing.
Lot of that comes from the Radial Tire limitation races.

I think if you have the racers put on a venue advertise in national and local newspapers their followers will come.
Intrigue !! Mystery !!

NHRA and IHRA trying and run as many cars through in an hour as possible.

I remember the days of rosin prepped tracks.
The pace slowed down.
The build up. The smack talk. Offside betting.
Everyone was lined up to see those races.
Features that made PINKS exciting.

How many times you see the Fans line up to watch Pro Stock like that ?

Just saying

D

[cal]

You know I have always had a problem with that wordage.

Driving is not a privilege, it is my right as a citizen of the USA to obtain a driver license.
Now if I miss use that right it can be taken away.

Just like walking down the street or going from state to state is not a privilege, It is my Right as a citizen of the USA.

Yes there are rules and laws to follow, and if I break them you can have these right also taken away. Put in jail, pay big fines ECT ECT ...

But these are our rights as citizen of this GREAT country.

OK I'm done running my mouth now, just had to get that off my chest

Cal
S/ST HR 1177

Originally Posted by Dwight Southerland

But driving is not a right; it's a privilege. As a citizen, you have the right to apply for a driver's license under equal protection of the law, but is is not a right that you can get in your car and operate it on public roads. It is a privilege you earn once you have shown that you know the laws, you agree to abide by the laws and you prove that you can operate a vehicle in a manner that does not endanger others or compromise the rights of others. Then you are given the privelege to operate a vehicle on public highways where the safety and rights of others will be observed. If you do not continue to operate your vehicle within the laws and guidelines that govern it, then the public authority (the government) will revoke your privileges. They do not take away your right to drive. You would still have the right to drive your vehicle somewhere beside publicly governed property, but you do not have the privilege to drive on public roads. In that manner, it is not a right. It is not even a right to walk down the street if you are going to do so in a manner that infringes on the rights or safety of others.


In like manner, NHRA is not "taking away rights" from these people. They are exercising their right to protect their image, reputation and standards that are explicitly stated in their membership material. Those standards are what you agree with to become a member. It's like unions restricting members from working on jobs or for others who do not observe union standards; you can go do the work if you want, but you won't be a union member if you do. An NHRA membership is not a "right" to race at NHRA's events. It is an extension to you of a privilege to participate. If you choose to not adhere to their membership standards, then they have the right to revoke that privilege.

Dwight while I agree to disagree on our rights as citizens of the USA.
What we both have said is simular, just written differently.
I doubt I would ever have the money or disire to dispute this in a court of law.
But maybe someone should, before we lose any rights we may have left.

I am not say in my statement anywhere that I agree with or dis agree with the Street Outlaws. In the late 70 early 80s I attened my share of street races, it is what we did back then.

But I mostly bracket raced back then. My License was to important to me, I needed to make a living and driving was important.

I only stated my opinion on privledge vs Rights of citizen of this USA.
Do we have any left, or are they all gone?

I still beleive Driving is a Right, if you read my post I did state that if you miss used that right it could be taken away. Guess I left out the part about you need to pass a test to get your license, which I agre with.

It is only my opinion, and i am intitled to my opinion.
I think.

Just like it is the right of a illegile imagrint to get a license.

It is my privledge to get one, What has America come to?

O yea I do watch Street Outlaws, I find it entertaining but know it is all staged.
That particular type of racing never was my cup of tea.

I do watch the outlaw grudge racing at the track but have no interest in that type of racing. Just like I watch TF, FC & Pro Stock but would never want to run any of them classes.

Thanks again
Cal
S/ST HR 1177