HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-20-2014, 11:15 PM   #1
Joseph Teuton
Member
 
Joseph Teuton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: HOUMA, LA
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Old vs New during rounds

I have it figured out guys, once the new car guys can't get old cars to run fast, out numbered 10-1, so we buy a car and become instant genius's maybe be we should line up and ask NHRA for 100hp because we all know if the older cars had any advantage then they would respectfully do the same for all of us! Maybe we should all ask the big 3 to please stop making new cars for our sport. I mean my 26 month old should only be able to drive a car pre1970's. I can't wait till 2020 to see what toys we have to play with! Espically to see what the old guys consider "old" cars then!! This is getting even better!!
__________________
JOSEPH TEUTON
4044 STK,SS,

Last edited by Joseph Teuton; 02-20-2014 at 11:18 PM.
Joseph Teuton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2014, 11:17 AM   #2
Michael Beard
VIP Member
 
Michael Beard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: Old vs New during rounds

Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Beard View Post
There is no correlation between HP factors and driving ability, nor is there any correlation between the veracity of any HP factor and any winning percentage (heads-up or otherwise).
Your mistaken about the heads ups. Been there.
No. Winning is a symptom, not causality. You may have been beat because a car was underfactored. The car was not underfactored because it beat you. I will get beat heads-up every time with my DragPak. That does not mean that it is not ridiculously underfactored. It means that I didn't spend money on mine.

HP Factors should not be determined based on winning percentages. HP Factors should be based on a working knowledge of engines, combinations, and real-world performance.

The HP factors on the 'factory race cars' are in no way shape or form defensible. Even production street cars are advertised at significantly higher HP. The fact that NHRA has done the same thing in the past does not make it right. Quite the opposite, such experience should have led to more proper decisions.

The idea that anyone with $100,000 invested in their car over a lifetime can or should scrap their car to purchase a new $100,000 car, or to scrap it and build only M/SA and slower cars is absolutely ridiculous. If someone has the wherewithal to do so and that's what they want to do: that's perfectly fine. No problem, have at it. If you want to take advantage of extremely favorable HP factors, no problem, have at it. I did. It's the only way I could afford getting into Super Stock, and I did it specifically *because* it was ridiculously underfactored.
__________________
Michael Beard - NHRA/IHRA 3216 S/SS
Michael Beard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2014, 11:26 AM   #3
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Old vs New during rounds

^^^^^ Yep, good post.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2014, 12:12 PM   #4
Joseph Teuton
Member
 
Joseph Teuton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: HOUMA, LA
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Old vs New during rounds

Guys yall are taking this all wrong.

All I was trying to get accross is that the old cars have won more races than the newer cars. If I'm not mistaken we all go to the races to "win" and have a good time. It seems that you dont need a "new" or the "fastest" in the class car to win.

Michael you are 100% correct that "The idea that anyone with $100,000 invested in their car over a lifetime can or should scrap their car to purchase a new $100,000 car, or to scrap it and build only M/SA and slower cars is absolutely ridiculous." I never brought up a dollar amount because money should not be the reason a car or driver wins, I simply stated that with the time and r&r that yall have put into yall's cars most likley equals the amount that was put in our cars at the time of purchase. You even stated that " I did. It's the only way I could afford getting into Super Stock, and I did it specifically *because* it was ridiculously underfactored." So we can pick an choose the cars we want to drive on this same factor? Everyone in racing wants as much advactage as they can get. We all know there will be a time when the combonation we are running will be no more good. This is why they have a whole bunch of other classes to race to make sure you stay away from the cars you dont want to run untill you get the combo you are looking for. That hasnt changed since NHRA was developed.

Yall have yall's opinion, we have ours. Back to the Title of the post...
I have 2 people that has posted they were out ran by a new car in the last 5 years. Im not saying this doesnt happen..... all im saying is does it happen enough for yall to keep bringing this up over and over again?

Underfactored cars does not equal better cars. Aren't we all just looking for the BEST race car? I may have this all wrong, I've been told this before. Hope all have a great Friday! The parades start tonight here in Houma,La!!
__________________
JOSEPH TEUTON
4044 STK,SS,
Joseph Teuton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2014, 12:11 PM   #5
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 132
Liked 373 Times in 131 Posts
Default Re: Old vs New during rounds

I don't know of any of the VIN-less class cars running in Q/SA.
For now I feel safe.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2014, 12:20 PM   #6
Joseph Teuton
Member
 
Joseph Teuton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: HOUMA, LA
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Old vs New during rounds

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALMACK View Post
I don't know of any of the VIN-less class cars running in Q/SA.
For now I feel safe.

Well my "S/N" number which can be found by MOPAR is 2011-008. Yea i know its not the 13 or 17 number like yalls but hey some of yalls cars didnt come with power windows either. Guys the times are changing its going to be ok. lol
__________________
JOSEPH TEUTON
4044 STK,SS,
Joseph Teuton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2014, 12:39 PM   #7
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 132
Liked 373 Times in 131 Posts
Default Re: Old vs New during rounds

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph Teuton View Post
Well my "S/N" number which can be found by MOPAR is 2011-008. Yea i know its not the 13 or 17 number like yalls but hey some of yalls cars didnt come with power windows either. Guys the times are changing its going to be ok. lol
I like the new cars...a lot.
My dream car is the 2013 CJ.


I remember back in '83 or '84 at the Winternationals seeing all those brand new Olds Cutlass 307 H.O. cars run in Stock.

As a young 22 year old, those brand new cars running 12's in Stock Eliminator was impressive to me.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2014, 01:03 PM   #8
sammy pizzolato
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: houma louisiana
Posts: 432
Likes: 52
Liked 56 Times in 13 Posts
Send a message via AIM to sammy pizzolato
Default Re: Old vs New during rounds

Pb i don't blame you one bit for building a new car.if i was building another car it would not be and old car i would build a late model. but NHRA should put it back the way they had it with a class for FI cars only. our old carb cars don't have a prayer aganst the new cars.and that is why you don't see me at all the races anymore i am not spending my hard earned money when i don't have a chance in a head's up race.i wish NHRA would wise up and put the FI classes back. and for the record i love watching the new cars our sport needs them but not in a heads up against and old car with a HP rating disadvantage.

Last edited by sammy pizzolato; 02-21-2014 at 01:11 PM.
sammy pizzolato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2014, 01:07 PM   #9
Joseph Teuton
Member
 
Joseph Teuton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: HOUMA, LA
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Old vs New during rounds

Quote:
Originally Posted by sammy pizzolato View Post
Pb i don't blame you one bit for building a new car.if i was building another car it would not be and old car i would build a late model. but NHRA should put it back the way they had it with a class for FI cars only. our old carb cars don't have a prayer aganst the new cars.and that is why you don't see me at all the races anymore i am not spending my hard earned money when i don't have a chance in a head's up race.i wish NHRA would wise up and put the FI classes back.
Mr. Sammy if you are will to put the bowtie's I can see about getting you a ride in a MOPAR. Lol I'm not sure if the Chevy Gods will accept you after that but hey it's worth a shot! Lol
__________________
JOSEPH TEUTON
4044 STK,SS,
Joseph Teuton is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.