|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
There are other racing organizations that you can be a part of. Or you can work on your combination to make it faster.
Last edited by Michael Colaluca; 09-12-2012 at 04:30 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Greater Boston
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 1,151
Liked 905 Times in 193 Posts
|
![]()
I think that at Indy, which is the NHRA's premier event, they ought to can the combo and have byes for class. It is not the racer's fault if no one else shows up in his or her class. If the manufacturers don't want to pay for a bye, stipulate no contingencies for byes but you'll get the Wally and Indy Class Winner status, My .02.
__________________
Bob Don 128 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
Has contingency money for class go up one dime? Do you realize how many trophies the didn't have to give out?
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 160
Likes: 27
Liked 20 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
I agree with Bob Don 100%. If you want to run for the $ in the Combo then do so. Other wise it would be great to win class , either against someone or a single. Very proud of class win either way. NHRA may get more entries and more $ if they would do this where they run class .
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Somerset,Ky
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 371
Liked 319 Times in 108 Posts
|
![]()
I want to run class,no break out,whether heads up or with handicap.There are some combo series I could go run but they don't have heads up races,so I just as soon stay close to home and run bracket,without heads up might as well bracket race.
Mike Taylor 3601 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 109
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
It is not what some people on class racer think. It is what NHRA thinks.
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
I guess I'm not getting a sense here on this forum of what is right or wrong with NHRA sanctioned "Combo" races"; i.e., having individual competitors race one another for the Stick or auto class win in the absence of fellow competitors.
I understand why NHRA and MAYBE some contingency sponsors want a Combo race. It appears they are not happy with awarding trophies and or cash to those entrants not facing competition in their respective class. Correct me if I'm wrong but as I understand it, NHRA has the program presently structured so there are only (4) events per year with Class runoffs. Initially, this seems like a good solution; if NHRA & the contingency sponsors actually thought there was a problem out there. I'm of the impression the racers had an opposite opinion. The problem that arises is one builds a car to be competitive in a particular class. And as racers have always said, "not my fault my fellow competitors didn't make it to the show". Or maybe there's not another competitor in the country. The bottom line is, a racer builds a car that is allowable per the rulebook. Whether anybody else follows suit is not his problem. But let's say you build the baddest SS car in the country given what you have to work with. And it's a '60's muscle car. It runs 1.15 under, maybe 11.00's. It's been torn down so many times that the block needs help-coils in every hole. He's at the top of the class and nobody can touch him. And in a combo race it would seem he should be racing cars that are at least similar. But in a combo race, he get's paired against something with a turbo or super charger, or a RWD conversion car, but basically, something that is not even remotely resembling what the racer built his car to compete in and against those in his respective class. It's not a bracket race so shoe polish isn't an issue. It's heads up. The issue is one guy built a car to be competitive in his class and is forced to race cars that are not even remotely in his class. Other than to say they were all built with the intention to go down a 1/4 mile as quickly as possible. So given that disparity, my view is that if there is less chance of singletons, then there is a better chance of not having to deal with the disparity of a Combo race. For that I see combining sticks and autos as a proposal that makes sense. That would cut the classes roughly in half and far less single runs for Class. As I stated elsewhere, use the auto index, the stick index or split it down the middle. HP adjustments will still fall into the AHFS and as I see it, some may hit the AHFS sooner than later if faced with more competition. Just an idea and if somebody has a viable alternative or doesn't like the idea of combining sticks and auto's, I'd like to hear them. And I know at least one manufacturer of new age drag cars is in agreement with me. They want the sticks and autos combined and don't agree with combo races. I'm sensing some of the other manufacturers have the same opinion. I recently calculated and posted here that approximately 12%-14% of NHRA S/SS racers compete with a stick.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 109
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
I will make it simple Jeff. Class has nothing to do with the eliminator in 2012 and on.
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|