HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-17-2012, 11:54 PM   #31
cicero819
VIP Member
 
cicero819's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Aylmer Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 31
Liked 69 Times in 30 Posts
Default Re: Pro stock NHRA unwanted child at the U.S Nationals

My new t -shirt at Indy " Pro-Stock should look like cars not like what comes out of my dogs rear" " or enter your saying here! Maybe NHRA will get the hint(not). Claude
cicero819 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2012, 01:54 AM   #32
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: Pro stock NHRA unwanted child at the U.S Nationals

The fan's shirts should red "Where's John and Courtney?When's that F/C,Pro Mod going to hit the wall.Ah screw ProStock,oh *hit here come them slow,boring fill in cars,time to go to the bathrom and then get a munch and Courtney's/John's autograph.
Of course it would have to be written on the front and back of the shirt.
People it ain't 1968 anymore.We are not viable anymore.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2012, 07:44 AM   #33
Don Sofranko
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Iowa
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Liked 128 Times in 32 Posts
Default Re: Pro stock NHRA unwanted child at the U.S Nationals

After watching the class since it started, I think I understand what many of us like and dislike about Pro Stock. Without even realizing it, all the drag race cars have become extremely efficient. With the cars launching low, being aerodynamic, clutchless or virtually automatic, the runs are very repeatable.

This is the problem since modified got axed, it runs into most classes, and is headed into even the wilder classes like outlaw SS and 10 wide racing. The more efficient Comp racing is, also makes it more boring. Look at a fast E/SMA like Travis Gusso drives... compared to Pappy's Pride A/A, Travis looks like a rental car going down the lane.

So some of you think EFI will make things wilder? Where is the logic in that? More erratic is more entertaining. Look at the most popular race of the year... the wheelstand contest at Byron. I would much rather watch some showmanship, than a F1 like car with no flaws.

So as a small cubic stick racer, I love pro stock because they are reving these 500 inch motors, higher than mouse motored cars. Think about that when you on the top end. Not even PRO MOD runs these kind of crank speeds. I always disliked the Mountain Motor IHRA stuff, no engine speed there. Pro stock still holds my interest, and EFI is just another step on the MORE efficient path.
Don Sofranko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2012, 08:58 AM   #34
Paul Merolla
Senior Member
 
Paul Merolla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Papillion, NE
Posts: 610
Likes: 242
Liked 293 Times in 65 Posts
Default Re: Pro stock NHRA unwanted child at the U.S Nationals

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Sofranko View Post
After watching the class since it started, I think I understand what many of us like and dislike about Pro Stock. Without even realizing it, all the drag race cars have become extremely efficient. With the cars launching low, being aerodynamic, clutchless or virtually automatic, the runs are very repeatable.

This is the problem since modified got axed, it runs into most classes, and is headed into even the wilder classes like outlaw SS and 10 wide racing. The more efficient Comp racing is, also makes it more boring. Look at a fast E/SMA like Travis Gusso drives... compared to Pappy's Pride A/A, Travis looks like a rental car going down the lane.

So some of you think EFI will make things wilder? Where is the logic in that? More erratic is more entertaining. Look at the most popular race of the year... the wheelstand contest at Byron. I would much rather watch some showmanship, than a F1 like car with no flaws.

So as a small cubic stick racer, I love pro stock because they are reving these 500 inch motors, higher than mouse motored cars. Think about that when you on the top end. Not even PRO MOD runs these kind of crank speeds. I always disliked the Mountain Motor IHRA stuff, no engine speed there. Pro stock still holds my interest, and EFI is just another step on the MORE efficient path.
My thoughts exactly! I really like P/S, but to me, it has evolved so much that a lot of the appeal is gone. The same can even be said for Super Gas...you don't see any more 4 speed Vega panel wagons these days.
Paul Merolla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2012, 08:16 PM   #35
cicero819
VIP Member
 
cicero819's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Aylmer Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 31
Liked 69 Times in 30 Posts
Default Re: Pro stock NHRA unwanted child at the U.S Nationals

Paul, Super Gas was suppose to be the replacement for Modified Production and allow the little guy to race. What NHRA really did was get rid of a group that was giving them fits and probably when they parked their cars on the grass was their way(NHRA) to remove the boil on their ar%#. Unfortunately, SG,SC, and SST with their timers and throttle stops(again NHRA to control excessive top end braking ) have totally ruined it for any spectators to truly enjoy the class. Ed, I know what you mean but it doesn't mean I have to accept it, look I know no one is steering the ship but I'm still going to try to get to the wheelhouse and slow it down before ramming into the iceberg and hopefully Captain (Compton) Smith won't be in the boats yet! Claude
cicero819 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2012, 09:22 PM   #36
FINESPLINE
Senior Member
 
FINESPLINE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Island of high taxes, N.Y.
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Pro stock NHRA unwanted child at the U.S Nationals

If you want an example of efficiency taking away from the show but improving the breed just look at the super stock hemi cars. Yes, they were exciting with their wheelsstands etc. but as they got faster the suspension has evolved or tuned to the point that a good leave has the wheels 1 to 2 ft off the ground or in some cases on the ground. Just watch the record setting runs over the last years. A lot less violence in the leave to the point of being quite smooth.
FINESPLINE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2012, 09:17 AM   #37
Don Sofranko
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Iowa
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Liked 128 Times in 32 Posts
Default Re: Pro stock NHRA unwanted child at the U.S Nationals

Yes finespline, you are correct. Ace chassis man Gary Jennings built some of the most efficient hemi cars ever (warfish cars), and his comp cars were the same quality. Same goes for Eastex, MPR, etc..

I guess we are going to have to love the subtlety of the smooth race car. No problem for me, they say its 10,000 RPM in pro stock right now.

I have always liked demo derbies, and within the last 5 years have decided these may be the last real hot rodders... in that they chop, grind, wrench, crunch, and then win or lose based on cave man like skills. Very entertaining, and really I do enjoy pro stock, and there should be many classes I can't afford. I am just a machinist after all.

When I go to the big races these days, I watch pro stock, Comp, SS, STK, and sometimes Super Street and the A/FD cars. The Super Comp dragsters are really not my cup of tea, and offer little in the way of entertainment.
Don Sofranko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2012, 10:00 AM   #38
Greg Hill
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 68
Liked 279 Times in 68 Posts
Default Re: Pro stock NHRA unwanted child at the U.S Nationals

When the cars in pro stock are unrecognizable you have a problem. Having them become a lot more like production cars would benefit the class and probably get more support from the auto companies.
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK
Greg Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2012, 10:17 AM   #39
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: Pro stock NHRA unwanted child at the U.S Nationals

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Hill View Post
When the cars in pro stock are unrecognizable you have a problem. Having them become a lot more like production cars would benefit the class and probably get more support from the auto companies.
Part of the problem is that they're,between contingency stickers and fugly graphics,you lose the aestetic look of the type of car it is.Some of them look like WWII warships.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	bateau-furtif-dazzle-painting-wold-war-guerre-02.jpg
Views:	353
Size:	8.8 KB
ID:	13132  
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2012, 10:18 AM   #40
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,485
Likes: 3,587
Liked 7,682 Times in 1,730 Posts
Default Re: Pro stock NHRA unwanted child at the U.S Nationals

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Sofranko View Post
I have always liked demo derbies, and within the last 5 years have decided these may be the last real hot rodders... in that they chop, grind, wrench, crunch, and then win or lose based on cave man like skills.
Then you should really try an oddball, "Dime Rocket" and get back to what hot rodding is all about!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.