|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,126
Likes: 1,583
Liked 1,892 Times in 423 Posts
|
![]()
You should talk to Jere Stahl sometime, and listen to the war stories about him, Grump, and Strickler with their traveling road show from that era. It's a riot. Stahl and Jenkins aren't close to each other in PA by accident. What a pair.
Alan Roehrich Bring "AA" classes to NHRA Stock Eliminator!
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: COLUMBUS,OHIO
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
JIM PARSON, DOES YOUR 1968 SHEET SHOW IF THE FOLLOWING WAS LEGAL ON THE 1968 CHEVELLE 327/ 325-350 HP OPTION. I HAD ONE NEW IN 1968 THAT CAME EQUIPPED WITH THE 803 CAST IRON INTAKE AND A QUADRAJET. WAS TOLD BY DEALER MECHANIC WHEN THEY REPLACED STOCK CLUTCH THE CAME APART THAT THEY COULD SWAP OUT THE CASTIRON INTAKE AND QUADRAJET FOR THE ALUMINM INTAKE AND THE HOLLEY LIKE THAT CAME ON THE SAME COMBO IN THE EARLIER NOVAS. SAID THEY COULD EVEN GET IT DOWN AS A WARRANTY SWAP OUT, BUT TJHAT DOESN'T MEAN IT WOULD HAVE BEEN NHRA APPROVED. I DO KNOW THAT THE 68 MADE I SWEET STRRET CAR THAT EVEN WITH THE CAST IRON INTAKE COULD SURPRISE A LOT OF BIG BLOCKS. THANKS MYRON STUTES
MYRONARL1119 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Kearney Mo
Posts: 199
Likes: 433
Liked 196 Times in 31 Posts
|
![]()
Myron,
Every thing I have says all 1968 327/325HP came with the Q-jet and 803 cast iron intake, even on the Vettes as Im helping with a resto to one of those now. You might check NHRA tech sheet on this year to confirm. I saw a 1957 Sedan delivery along side of the road the other day and though about you. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Jim...thanks for the info. Do you know if the '68 Chevy II with the 327 ci 325 hp was a stick only combo?
From my personal street experience (hehe), the '66 Chevy II L79 was an awesome car; only other cars that came close to beating me were the early year Firebrids with the 400 ci. Those Firebirds were REAL sleepers. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 64
Liked 783 Times in 195 Posts
|
![]()
If you look at the Tech Specs on line, you will note that the carburetor listing indicates "SM only" meaning that the only listing is for "SynchroMesh" transmission. That may have meant 3-speed or 4-speed.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I always thought "SM" meant "stick / manual". And if you race a stick car it could mean "saddo masochist" ! (sp?)
NHRA #7494 SS/H 1970 AMC AMX "Best Appearing" @ NHRA '06 Pacific Sports Nationals JeffLeeAzRealty@Qwest.net 602-418-9797 |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
When I was taking driver's training class in high school (1955-'56... no typo) I asked our instructor whether the '54 Chevy stick-shift car we were using as a training vehicle had a "Synchro-Mesh" transmission, or not...
He gave me a "deer-in-the -headlights," eyes glazed-over look and said something like, "How the hell would I know???" LOL! Bill
__________________
Bill |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
The L-79 in a 66 Chevy II was the baddest thing on the streets back when they came out of the dealers. Their light weight is what made them so quick compared to other factory rides of the day. Most of us who were participants during the 60's street racing days knew not to tie into a 350 horse Nova.
Oddly enough todays so-called experts on 60's musclecars overlook the L-79 in a 66 Nova giving more credit to Boss 429's, LS6 Chevelles, etc. The reason the L-79 as a musclecar is overlooked is due to the lack of coverage the car magazines gave it in 1966. The best ET in a road test article the L-79 got was mid 15's. This is the only thing younger journalists doing research have to go by since the L-79 in a Nova was a one year deal. However anyone who street raced back then knew how awesome this combo was. Disclaimer: Opinions expressed by me on this forum are exactly that, my opinions. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
One man's NOVA...
I had a good friend (Charlie Malyuke) who bought a new L-79 Nova and raced it, but not in Stock Eliminator. He made threse modifications: 1. 3310 Holley (780cfm to replace the 560 cfm Holley it came with) 2. Hood scoop 3. Slapper bars 4. 5.38 gears 5. Isky hydraulic cam 6. Headers 6. 8" M & H slicks It ran 12.60s with Charlie aboard. At that time, Charlie probably weighed 300 pounds. Needed a 2.54 low 4-speed; had a 2,20 low and would almost bog, even leaving at 6 grand... He drove it on the street like that, but not often. Hardly ever got outrun.... Bill
__________________
Bill |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
In 67 you could get the L-79 in a Chevelle with a aluminum intake and Holley and it was rated at 325 hp.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|