Get rid of 1k readings - Page 3

junior barns · 02-08-2011, 03:15 PM

I'm with Dan! I am a so-called average racer/driver and if my odds of winning go from say 15% to 10% because of this change go for it!!!

I personally think my odds would increase not decrease! IMO.

Mark Faul · 02-08-2011, 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Fletcher

I say we get rid of ALL the incrementals AND reaction times...lets make things as challenging as possible...

Just think how much less stressful life would be at Fletchburg racing. You wouldn't have to obsess for hours why your car was off by .002 in a certain incremental time. You'd be able to relax with a Michelob Ultra and enjoy yourself for a change! LOL

Dan Fletcher · 02-08-2011, 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Faul

Just think how much less stressful life would be at Fletchburg racing. You wouldn't have to obsess for hours why your car was off by .002 in a certain incremental time. You'd be able to relax with a Michelob Ultra and enjoy yourself for a change! LOL

SERIOUSLY!!! How much more enjoyable it would be to just put an et and mph in the book. Talk about making life easier for those of us with OCD. Please, take the gun out of my hand...LOL...

Ed Wright · 02-08-2011, 04:05 PM

I still think it's a good idea.

02-08-2011, 03:15 PM	#1
junior barns Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 541 Likes: 11 Liked 20 Times in 14 Posts	Re: Get rid of 1k readings I'm with Dan! I am a so-called average racer/driver and if my odds of winning go from say 15% to 10% because of this change go for it!!! I personally think my odds would increase not decrease! IMO.

02-08-2011, 04:05 PM	#4
Ed Wright Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Sand Springs, OK Posts: 8,132 Likes: 896 Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts	Re: Get rid of 1k readings I still think it's a good idea. __________________ Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA