|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Wadsworth, Ohio
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Never go backwards in life, always look for room to improve, move ahead. Taking away timers is going backwards. "imo"
The only thing I would like to see change is someone let me win ![]() BB no change is better than going backwards. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Agree completely.
__________________
Chris Williams 6304 SC, TD, ET |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: houston,tx
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I think super street is fine. But super gas I feel you could lower the index to 9.50 and super comp to 8.50 and not hurt anyone. Average super gas car can go 9.50 as well as super comp 8.50.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
8.00,9.00&10.00 hmmmm sounds like NHRA UNLEASHED?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 251
Likes: 159
Liked 134 Times in 70 Posts
|
![]()
NHRA sent me the poll for SC and SG but didnt send me the SST one . I would like to see them 8.0, 9.0 and 10.0 but I voted for 8.50 and 9.50 through the email from NHRA . I voted on this site for 10.50 and no Scotty Rule , I'm not scared and SST isn't entry level . Granted speeding up the index may be an issue at some altitudes , maybe that could be adjusted a little more for some tracks . I also think that a .400 tree should be a .400 tree not .370 as a .500 should be a .500 . I mean come on guys why the hell do we have delay boxes ? Then theres the mph thing SPEED LIMITS ARE FOR HIGHWAYS AND STREETS ! . I thought racing of any form was about going fast ! So stop complaining . I dont go backwards on anything in life if they turn SST into a bracket race or put a mph cap on it I will go IHRA .
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ottawa, OH
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() Now I'm calling bbbbb ssssss!!! ![]()
__________________
Damien Hazelton Lucky Dog Racing |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Morton, IL
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I have a S/G roadster, what class would you suggest? If you are concerned about throttle stops and high MPH, then maybe you should stick to bracket racing.
__________________
Ryan Koener S/G 310C |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 299
Likes: 3
Liked 36 Times in 26 Posts
|
![]()
Ryan, I think you should run super gas. that is the class that I run in and I really don't care if you are going 150 or 180. I will do my best to win the round. My motors are small compared to others, probably the smallest cubic inch in the class at the event. The car counts in the midwest seem to me to be pretty good in the super classes. I don't understand why you want to change the indexes to something like 9.0. I will be out. I will not run sst because of the minimum weight and the .5 tree. I love to race, and racing the high mph cars is tough to do. But if they lower the index to 9.0 or 8.9 for super gas, I am going to have to sit out. Bottom line I love to race, but the CAT cars, are wanting to change the index, and I don't want to see that happen.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
No weight limit in sst.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Just thinking no t-stops mile per hour rules in all class's no burnonts ( no smoke got to go green ) no trees, women in bikinis with flags no finish line, he who has the biggest gun wins really though no weight limit in sst...................... RUM TO ALL WINNERS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Morton, IL
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Ryan Koener S/G 310C |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|