HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-30-2010, 04:42 PM   #1
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Smile Re: 4 wide is the answer

[QUOTE=Ed Fernandez;178692]
Quote:
Originally Posted by art leong View Post

Artie how about the famous red light button he supposedly had available to him?Rember that rumor?
The "RED LIGHT" button was a real deal at Aquasco in Md.back in the 50's and 60's. I saw it used and know the guy who pushed the button. I heard the rumor of one at Capitol Raceway but never saw it. The same family owned both tracks at that time AND Ciecil County.

Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 03-30-2010 at 04:45 PM.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2010, 04:40 PM   #2
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Cool Re: 4 wide is the answer

Quote:
Originally Posted by herbjr View Post
Its amazing how these two types of cars have made so many cars worthless. THe only answer to this is do away with heads up runs during eliminations.
This would sure make cheating a lost art. Except for class and records no one would bother unless money came back in for class wins. The $$$$$$ in the game such as we see today would be thrown out the window except for those few with more money than brains (sounds like some on here already) and a BIG ego. . Id vote for it but my vote dosent count....lol. It might come down to it because of the expense of keeping records, the AHFS; up to date engine specs, and GOOD (people who know what this stuff should look like and have no "friends" in the tear down barn) and knowledgeable tech guys like Travis and Dave Ley, etc. It has almost become a lost art to have the love, work ethic and dedication it takes to be a good stock and S/S tech person. OK....so shoot me but thats how I see it today.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 09:28 AM   #3
Bobby DiDomenico
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 924
Likes: 104
Liked 101 Times in 52 Posts
Default Re: 4 wide is the answer

Quote:
Originally Posted by herbjr View Post
Its amazing how these two types of cars have made so many cars worthless. THe only answer to this is do away with heads up runs during eliminations.
Herb,

Not to stir up the heads up in elimnations "discussion", but what would happen at four wide (what did Wilkerson call it...) where lane 1 is B/SA, lane 2 is W/S, lane 3 is B/SA, and lane 4 is I/SA? Do the 2 B/SA cars have to run each other flat out yet not break out?
Hey, maybe I could get a job with NHRA as Sportsman Czar.....
Bobby DiDomenico is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 09:59 AM   #4
W J
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Paxton, Massachusetts
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 4 wide is the answer

Once a few more major issues arise w/4 wide, or a huge accident, I'm betting it'll fade away....just like wide whitewalls did...The original "save time when oil-downs occur theory" by swapping over to the spare 2 lanes was great, though....just my .02......WJ
W J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 10:22 AM   #5
Bryan Worner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duncannon, PA
Posts: 825
Likes: 136
Liked 535 Times in 86 Posts
Default Re: 4 wide is the answer

I've got the solution for 4 wide racing! If you like it, go to Charlotte and/or Vegas (once it's converted)! If you don't like it.......stay away from those two tracks!

I just think it would be cool to try to run class 4 wide at those tracks! My class (7 cars) would have been decided on the track, not on paper!
Bryan Worner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 10:25 AM   #6
vic guilmino
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: wv
Posts: 884
Likes: 42
Liked 56 Times in 21 Posts
Default Re: 4 wide is the answer

i would like 4 wide for class but not elim.
and i have done 4 wide in 1966 at york, pa
__________________
Vic Guilmino 1129 STK
vic guilmino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 11:05 AM   #7
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: 4 wide is the answer

I can't imagine what could be wrong with 4 wide class run-offs. It would save time and equipment.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 11:11 AM   #8
Paul Ceasrine
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Default Re: 4 wide is the answer

VIC,
Your absolutely correct.
If done, for 'Class Only'.
Can you just imagine an old style eliminator.
A/S; Lane 1
O/SA; Lane 2
F/SA; Lane 3
H/S; Lane 4
Imagine the racers panicking,, what Lane did he say???
Or how about, 'How Many Four-Letter words can you spell?
Oh Well,,,'at least they tried'.
Double-Wide x 2.
Paul Ceasrine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 11:35 AM   #9
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Thumbs up Re: 4 wide is the answer

Quote:
Originally Posted by vic guilmino View Post
i would like 4 wide for class but not elim.
and i have done 4 wide in 1966 at york, pa
Ive done 3 at a time when I was younger but only because I couldnt get the 4th girl to join in. !
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.