New Camaro ET's - Page 2

W J · 07-23-2009, 07:32 PM

[quote=jimi;131273]

Quote:

Originally Posted by treessavoy

Took the PT Cruiser to test and tune at Gainesville and ran a new Camaro SS twice. Automatic car that ran 13.74 and 14.05 then he parked it.

that is pathetic! i hope that the driver of the camaro really sucked, i took my 4300# 09 challenger 5.7 6speed and went 13.62 @ 104.00 bone stock!!!! i was told the camaro's only weigh 3600 with driver.it should be a lot quicker.

'010 Camaro coupe = 3860 LESS driver.

WJ

TOSTO RACING · 07-23-2009, 08:04 PM

I've seen numerous 6spd 2010 camaro's run 13.0's some are running high 12's at 110 mph with good drivers bone stock.

BLAZER · 07-25-2009, 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TOSTO RACING

I've seen numerous 6spd 2010 camaro's run 13.0's some are running high 12's at 110 mph with good drivers bone stock.

Your right on--they weigh alittle over 4,000 lbs with 150 pd. driver--the C6 corvette 6 speed runs 12.50s @ 116 mph--same motor but 600 pds. lighter--

MikeFicacci · 07-25-2009, 04:01 PM

We took a bone stock 2010 Camaro with an automatic transmission to E-Town last month and ran a 13.2 at 108. With just a tune, we went 12.89 at 109.5. With a set of American Racing Headers (1 3/4") and a larger camshaft, we went 12.21 at 114 mph in 3500-feet.

On another note, we put a P-1SC-1 Procharger on a Pontiac G8 (almost identical to the Camaro) and went 11.42 at 124 mph with a 2.08 60-foot and stock converter. Both cars are still averaging 30 mph on the highway, idle quietly at 550 rpm, and are on 93 octane. We now have a Pontiac G8 with an LS7 (Z06 engine) and a D-1SC Procharger that makes 880 horsepower.

The independent rear has consistently been launched in recent testing with the new Camaro and a Vigilante 3200-stall torque converter with sub 1.55 60-foot times completely stock. The 6L60E automatic transmission is absolutely bulletproof.

keith ohanesian · 07-24-2009, 05:46 PM

[QUOTE=jimi;131273]

Quote:

Originally Posted by treessavoy

Took the PT Cruiser to test and tune at Gainesville and ran a new Camaro SS twice. Automatic car that ran 13.74 and 14.05 then he parked it.

that is pathetic! i hope that the driver of the camaro really sucked, i took my 4300# 09 challenger 5.7 6speed and went 13.62 @ 104.00 bone stock!!!! i was told the camaro's only weigh 3600 with driver.it should be a lot quicker.

This is funny. "that's pathetic".... Jimi my tow vehicle goes 13.50 with two people in it. Oh that's @ 8000 pounds... Its almost as fast as the car its pulling.

jarn05 · 07-29-2009, 10:08 AM

[QUOTE=keith ohanesian;131432]

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimi

This is funny. "that's pathetic".... Jimi my tow vehicle goes 13.50 with two people in it. Oh that's @ 8000 pounds... Its almost as fast as the car its pulling.

hey **** and balls! how have you been? i saw you at lebanon valley did not have the time to stop by, you probably have three times as much invested into your truck just in the turbo and head studs then you have spent on the old camaro!!!!!! hahaha, stop by some time to shoot the *****.

cambria · 07-27-2009, 12:02 PM

I will run mine wednesday and let you know

MikeFicacci · 07-27-2009, 01:06 PM

With both the Camaro and G8 you can leave from idle or 1000 to 1500 rpm. The converter we use is a Vigilante 2800-stall triple-disc lock-up from Precision Industries. The problem isn't getting the car to hook, the problem is the 1/2 shift that spins with just about every tire we put under it. We put the car in manual mode and shift at 5500 instead of 6400 which tends to take care of the problem.

The Camaro is going to be a very quick car with a few modifications. One of the biggest advantages with the 6L80E cars is the L99 engine with variable valve timing technology. The problem we are now having with out 850 horsepower G8 is that no one will let us run 10's at over 140 without a roll bar, jacket, driveshaft loop, etc... Although we will be running it next week.

GeorgeInNePa · 07-27-2009, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeFicacci

With both the Camaro and G8 you can leave from idle or 1000 to 1500 rpm. The converter we use is a Vigilante 2800-stall triple-disc lock-up from Precision Industries. The problem isn't getting the car to hook, the problem is the 1/2 shift that spins with just about every tire we put under it. We put the car in manual mode and shift at 5500 instead of 6400 which tends to take care of the problem.

The Camaro is going to be a very quick car with a few modifications. One of the biggest advantages with the 6L80E cars is the L99 engine with variable valve timing technology. The problem we are now having with out 850 horsepower G8 is that no one will let us run 10's at over 140 without a roll bar, jacket, driveshaft loop, etc... Although we will be running it next week.

I haven't tried leaving from idle yet, I've been foot-braking it to 2000.

Sean Haning · 07-27-2009, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeFicacci

The problem we are now having with out 850 horsepower G8 is that no one will let us run 10's at over 140 without a roll bar, jacket, driveshaft loop, etc... Although we will be running it next week.

Every track will let you do it once, lol. Some twice if you tell them the first time was an accident.

07-23-2009, 08:04 PM	#2
TOSTO RACING Senior Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: DRAGSTRIP Posts: 892 Likes: 917 Liked 662 Times in 187 Posts	Re: New Camaro ET's I've seen numerous 6spd 2010 camaro's run 13.0's some are running high 12's at 110 mph with good drivers bone stock. __________________ 5664 GHI/SA 1985 CAMARO RED H/SA 1985 CAMARO BLUE I/SA

07-25-2009, 04:01 PM	#4
MikeFicacci Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 242 Likes: 1 Liked 19 Times in 2 Posts	Re: New Camaro ET's We took a bone stock 2010 Camaro with an automatic transmission to E-Town last month and ran a 13.2 at 108. With just a tune, we went 12.89 at 109.5. With a set of American Racing Headers (1 3/4") and a larger camshaft, we went 12.21 at 114 mph in 3500-feet. On another note, we put a P-1SC-1 Procharger on a Pontiac G8 (almost identical to the Camaro) and went 11.42 at 124 mph with a 2.08 60-foot and stock converter. Both cars are still averaging 30 mph on the highway, idle quietly at 550 rpm, and are on 93 octane. We now have a Pontiac G8 with an LS7 (Z06 engine) and a D-1SC Procharger that makes 880 horsepower. The independent rear has consistently been launched in recent testing with the new Camaro and a Vigilante 3200-stall torque converter with sub 1.55 60-foot times completely stock. The 6L60E automatic transmission is absolutely bulletproof.

07-27-2009, 12:02 PM	#7
cambria Member Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Buffalo Posts: 235 Likes: 0 Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: New Camaro ET's I will run mine wednesday and let you know __________________ BS/A,A/FIA 00 Camaro- CS/A, B/FIA 94 Camaro .2012 copo 4.0

07-27-2009, 01:06 PM	#8
MikeFicacci Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 242 Likes: 1 Liked 19 Times in 2 Posts	Re: New Camaro ET's With both the Camaro and G8 you can leave from idle or 1000 to 1500 rpm. The converter we use is a Vigilante 2800-stall triple-disc lock-up from Precision Industries. The problem isn't getting the car to hook, the problem is the 1/2 shift that spins with just about every tire we put under it. We put the car in manual mode and shift at 5500 instead of 6400 which tends to take care of the problem. The Camaro is going to be a very quick car with a few modifications. One of the biggest advantages with the 6L80E cars is the L99 engine with variable valve timing technology. The problem we are now having with out 850 horsepower G8 is that no one will let us run 10's at over 140 without a roll bar, jacket, driveshaft loop, etc... Although we will be running it next week.