|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: zoo york
Posts: 572
Likes: 3
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Ok Junior, Im home, Now I see it....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bridgeport,CT.
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 1,667
Liked 2,638 Times in 440 Posts
|
![]()
The T-bolt is in the classification guide as legal for Stock eliminator. It is listed with a factor of 7.63 which makes it a natural AA car; ironically the CJ factor is 7.62. I have never seen one in Stock, but they certainly are legal for Stock eliminator.
Bill Seabrooks - superfan1 Bridgeport, Ct |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dayton Ohio
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
What the hell makes the difference, it's all just bracket racing with the correct carb(throttle body). The genie flew out of the bottle a long time ago.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charlestown, Indiana
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
That looks really cool.....
I want one of those!!!!! ![]() Jacob |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by bsa633; 03-14-2009 at 12:55 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 2,181
Liked 2,361 Times in 558 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The intake doesn't look "Stock", but an Edelbrock Six Pack intake with three Holleys probably didn't look so stock to a guy running a Nomad in 1969. I wonder what they thought about that lift off hood? The fact that the intake is on a fuel injected motor makes me wonder what the true gains in HP would be over a shorter one. You only need so much plenum volume ahead of the injectors. Maybe someone wiser than me can answer that? It does look cool! These cars are good for class racing. Just look at how much traffic this web site has gotten from them! As someone who has built several late model Stockers, I can tell you that it is a real shame to remove pickup loads of brand new parts and haul them to a junk yard. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everson, WA.
Posts: 122
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Shawn Blair 6383 SS 634 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ontario,canada
Posts: 442
Likes: 71
Liked 76 Times in 31 Posts
|
![]()
in 1970 you could go to the dealer and buy a 426 hemi challenger, ins.and plates away you go,now these new cars ,the drag pak chall.cannot be street driven and is not avalible after a certain quota,has been met.dodge had the factory race car in s/s,the lightened front end car with the hemi ,it just looks to modified to run as a stock elim. car.some will agree and disagree,
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
I personally believe that BOTH the Supercharged Mustang and the new Challengers belong in S/S or thier own class....NOT in stock eliminator. The rule book should be revised to say a larger number (min 100 and documented) should be produced and avaliable to the general public to who anyone who can afford them and want one. They dont have to be street legal due to all of the Govt. BS thats required to pass EPA and safety regulations today but no special runs of such small amounts produced. My 1 cent worth
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 312
Likes: 1
Liked 134 Times in 32 Posts
|
![]()
It is what it is. Ford is going to kick some ***.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|