|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
M/T spent a lot of money last year researching and testing their P/S tire. I'm sure they are more than a little pissed about the "exclusive" supplier deal.
Maybe NHRA can supply the tires to the pro's like they do with the nitro. After a small markup of course. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 68
Likes: 21
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
|
![]()
M/T got hosed by NHRA. Brian
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canandaigua, NY
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Marc Caruso S/G 132 S/C C132 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: sparta tn
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
I support Mickey Thompsons decision. They have been a major sponsor for 26 years with the NHRA and they deserve to be treated better. For NHRA to change the rules without first consulting or informing companies like M/T goes to show why the list of contingency paying companies gets shorter each year.
The NHRA continues to act more like a government agency with no regard for the people or companies that are affected by their decisions. M/T has made the best working sportsman tires forever, and I'm sure you will see them supporting the sportsman racers through their team M/T program or other events and sanctioning bodies. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|