HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Nostalgia Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-28-2015, 02:32 AM   #1
CJME
Junior Member
 
CJME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Quincy Illinois
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Rear Gear Ratio

I run a 68 camaro with an M22 trans and a 4.56 rear gear. With 28" tires i either bog the engine at launch or burn the tires off. What rear end gear do you guys recommend with this combo? i was thinking 5.38. Engine is a 12.5:1 332 and the car weighs 3000lbs.
CJME is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2015, 12:57 PM   #2
Geerhead55
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tacoma, Washington
Posts: 1,632
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Wink Re: Rear Gear Ratio

I can only speak for myself,, but back in the day,, I ran a '66 Nova SS, that was over 3,000lbs with me in it. It had a 331/ 4-speed combo with a 10.5x 29.5 tire. I started out with 4:88s and eventually put 5:57s in it. I'd launch at 7,300- shift around the same and go through the top end at 7,600. This was with 'ol Lakewood traction bars, Moroso front springs and 90-10 shocks, as that's all we had. It pulled 'em up in 2 gears and was a fun ride! I know technology has come a long ways since the '70s, but its still basic math finding what the car likes. You've got to get it to hook first, consistently, before you start playing anymore. Put a good slick under it and work your suspension.Good luck with your project.
Danny Durham

Last edited by Geerhead55; 09-28-2015 at 01:02 PM.
Geerhead55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2015, 10:19 PM   #3
CJME
Junior Member
 
CJME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Quincy Illinois
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Rear Gear Ratio

I run MT 28/11.5/15 ET streets and i'm soon changing to Hoosier slicks 28/10.5/15. The 2.20 first gear of the M22 is killing my 60 ft. There are two options i'm considering: Changing trans to a 2.88 first gear or change rear end gears. Which do you guys recommend from experience?
CJME is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2015, 11:56 AM   #4
Jeff Stout
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 66
Liked 706 Times in 283 Posts
Default Re: Rear Gear Ratio

My old 70 Chevelle with 355 had 5.13 and 2.88 first with 50 lb flywheel. I would leave at 4000 and it would hook very well and not bog but drive through first pretty good. This was back in 1995 so Im sure its not whats best today
Jeff Stout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2015, 12:36 PM   #5
Mike Pearson
VIP Member
 
Mike Pearson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,462
Likes: 620
Liked 1,948 Times in 589 Posts
Default Re: Rear Gear Ratio

You will only get a handful of runs with that Muncie once you put a lower gear in the rear. I would put a 5.57 to start with. Put a Jerico trans with a 3.10 low gear. Also you want a light flywheel. I ran a 14 lb. wheel in my car years back. it was much faster than the 25 lb. wheel. With a stick car you want some wheel spin to keep the RPM up and the breakage down.
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS
Mike Pearson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2015, 05:30 PM   #6
tj310
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dresden On. Canada
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Rear Gear Ratio

In our 305 J/S it's gone quicker every time I've put more rear gear to it , 6.0 now .. A good trans ( Liberty ,G force , Jerico ) and a slipper clutch will save money and aggravation in the long run. ---Trevor
tj310 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.