Can anyone explain NHRA?

[Joe Pinkston]

I had another racer ask me this question today. I didn't have an answer for him.

First off, this is not a thread intended to criticize or bash NHRA, so I guess what we would like to know is this:

1. Who decides on who the board of director members are?

2. Why as dues paying members of NHRA, we have no voice in who the board members are?

3. Who actually "owns" NHRA?

4. If NHRA was to be sold, who would actually pocket the money?

I understand how a Sub Chapter S Corp. works, but trying to explain how whatever type of corperation NHRA is actually works is something I couldn't do. Since it is a "non-profit" corperation I assume that the profits left on the books at the end of the year are distributed to the board of director members as bonuses to clear the books. Am I wrong about this?

I thought I would throw this out to you all and see what kind of answers I get. Hopefully something in simple terms we could all understand.

[bill dedman]

Before this goes any farther,

JULIE: is a "not-for-profit corporation" the same as a "non-profit corporation," or, are the laws governing them different???

Explain that, if you have time, please.


Bill

[Joe Pinkston]

Thanks for pointing that out Bill. When I re-read this I wondered if I used the right term or not.

[dartman]

Originally Posted by bill dedman

Before this goes any farther,

JULIE: is a "not-for-profit corporation" the same as a "non-profit corporation," or, are the laws governing them different???

Explain that, if you have time, please.


Bill

A non-profit organization (abbreviated "NPO", also "not-for-profit") is a legally constituted organization whose objective is to support or engage



Whereas for-profit corporations exist to earn and distribute taxable business earnings to shareholders, the nonprofit corporation exists solely to provide programs and services that are of public benefit. Often these programs and services are not otherwise provided by local, state, or federal entities. While they are able to earn a profit, more accurately called a surplus, such earnings must be retained by the organization for its future provision of programs and services. Earnings may not benefit individuals or stake-holders[1]. Underlying many effective nonprofit endeavors is a commitment to management. Twenty years ago, management was a dirty word to those involved in nonprofit organizations. It meant business, and non-profits prided themselves on being free of the taint of commercialism and above such sordid considerations as the bottom line. Now most of them have learned that nonprofits need management even more than business does, precisely because they lack the discipline of the bottom line. The nonprofits are, of course still dedicated to "doing good." But they also realize that good intentions are no substitute for organization and leadership, for accountability, performance, and results. Those require management and that, in turn, begins with the organization's mission.

[Julie Jordan]

A"non-profit" has become a generic name for a tax-exempt organization. The profits earned in these organizations are not subject to income taxes. They have profits (or else they won't be in existance long), can own properties, most anything a normal business can do. If they have "unrelated business income" then those profits are subject to tax.

NHRA is a 501(c)(6) organization (IRS code section).An IRC 501(c)(6) organization is a membership organization characteristically supported by dues. While such an organization may receive a substantial portion or even the primary part of its income from non-member sources, membership support, both in the form of dues and involvement in the organization's activities, must be at a meaningful level (thus we all pay annual "dues"). There is no requirement that the members have any say in the operations. The original bylaws and articles of incorporation or association would outline how the board of directors is determined.

No one "owns" NHRA. Should the organization dissolve or be sold the assets would have to be distributed to a similar type organization. Again, the bylaws would clarify where these assets would go. Most states (in California it would be the State Attorney General's office) would have to approve a sale and distribution of assets to insure they did, indeed, go to their intended purpose.

The NHRA Museum is a 501(c)(3) organization, basically a charitable organization. Payments made to this entity would be tax-deductible. Payments made to NHRA are not.

Probably the largest and most successful 501(c)(6) organization is the NFL.

[Greg Hill]

Julie the difference between the NFL and the NHRA is that the NFL management is accountable to the owners of the team. As far as I can figure out the board and top management of NHRA has no one to be accountable to. How are board members chosen?

[Tony Janes]

There is no comparison to the drag racing of the sixties and the present day drag racing.

[Joe Pinkston]

Originally Posted by dartman

A non-profit organization (abbreviated "NPO", also "not-for-profit") is a legally constituted organization whose objective is to support or engage



Whereas for-profit corporations exist to earn and distribute taxable business earnings to shareholders, the nonprofit corporation exists solely to provide programs and services that are of public benefit. Often these programs and services are not otherwise provided by local, state, or federal entities. While they are able to earn a profit, more accurately called a surplus, such earnings must be retained by the organization for its future provision of programs and services.

If this wording, or something simular to it was part of the tax codes back in the mid 50's then that could explain alot.

It was before my time, but I guess NHRA was originated as an idea to provide services that were viewed as being of public benefit. I'm not sure you could sell that idea today (then again maybe you could), but I guess it was easy to prove that what they were doing was something of public benefit back then. I would assume as long as the terms of the original charter were not broken in any way it would still be legal and valid up until today.

Bruce; thanks for the link to the IRS documents.

[bill dedman]

Thanks, Julie.
This is in no way a reference to NHRA, but from what you described, it (non-profits) sounds like a license to steal.

Just my 2-cents...


Bill

[Ed Fernandez]

Originally Posted by bill dedman

Thanks, Julie.
This is in no way a reference to NHRA, but from what you described, it (non-profits) sounds like a license to steal.

Just my 2-cents...


Bill

Bill
Google "list of non profit organizations" then take your foot out of your mouth.There are a few I don't agree with (ACLU for example) but there are MANY that do alot of good for people here and around the world.
One is the Paralyzed Vets of America.I've given to them in memory of my father in law who eventually became blind due to an injury during the Battle of the Bulge in Belgium.They sent him book cassettes
which helped him to cope.
Research something before you tap the keys on your computer.



Ed F.

Eed F.