HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-04-2009, 02:02 PM   #1
rx dealer
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lake Orion, Michigan
Posts: 337
Likes: 12
Liked 53 Times in 13 Posts
Default "DRAG PACK" Challenger gets NHRA approval

The challenger got the "nod" yesterday. Lets get the 6.1L Hemi go head to head with the CJ Mustang, and also the camaro package is dead. ( that's PERIOD )...Luke
rx dealer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 02:15 PM   #2
junior barns
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 541
Likes: 11
Liked 20 Times in 14 Posts
Default Re: "DRAG PACK" Challenger gets NHRA approval

What do you mean (the camaro pkg is dead)
junior barns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 02:18 PM   #3
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: "DRAG PACK" Challenger gets NHRA approval

I guess you mean GM will not release the body in white cars?Maybe I'm wrong but if GM presented the argument to the government that these cars are only a body with no implied warranty that would be sold for pure profit I can't see any objection to letting them market them.Build,sell,no warranty,future parts sales with no warranty.Pure profit and free advertising.
Let's hope that the Challengers will bring the CJ's out in the open and factored a little more real world.
Disclaimer : Waa waa waa waa waa waa waa............................................... .................................
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA

Last edited by Ed Fernandez; 03-04-2009 at 02:20 PM.
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 02:26 PM   #4
rx dealer
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lake Orion, Michigan
Posts: 337
Likes: 12
Liked 53 Times in 13 Posts
Default Re: "DRAG PACK" Challenger gets NHRA approval

Junior and Ed

No Camaro like body in white or ZL-1 type cars ( only 50 made stuff ).
rx dealer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 03:11 PM   #5
west coast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rainy Washington
Posts: 609
Likes: 12
Liked 223 Times in 73 Posts
Default Re: "DRAG PACK" Challenger gets NHRA approval

I look on NHRA did not see the Challenger in the stock car classifaction. Were was this published
west coast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 03:28 PM   #6
rx dealer
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lake Orion, Michigan
Posts: 337
Likes: 12
Liked 53 Times in 13 Posts
Default Re: "DRAG PACK" Challenger gets NHRA approval

west coast

The guys ( NHRA ) were in Auburn Hills yesterday for a final look and it's a done deal. This is going to be good HEMI vs. COBRA JET, let the whining begin...Luke
rx dealer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 04:00 PM   #7
Dick Butler
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: "DRAG PACK" Challenger gets NHRA approval

If they build a new Camaro for SALE to the public, there WILL be a camaro to race the "other two"
Some one will build one or 10 or 50 what ever it takes.
From what I heard it is gigantic compared to the old ones so maybe just put them all in TOP/STK and let them see if a 69 Camaro can handle them... I could see me being re interested in racing if that could happen. I imagine someone would like a new Vette better but A camaro would be a more parallel car.
Dick Butler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.