|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
Bob,
Through all the 60 years I've been racing I have always heard the Corvette ratings were higher on like combinations because of the Stock Exhaust manifolds and the Stock Pan configuration. For the life of me I can't see how a Exhaust Manifold difference in all classes that allow aftermarket headers is even a consideration for HP variations. Now a Stocker with a Stocker pan.. I can see that there could be a difference...In Super Stock and Super Stock GT where aftermarket pans are allowed I don't see any reason to add HP to "like" engine combinations. Is NHRA Tech going back to some wheelbase considerations like in the old days with Ford and Mopar??
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sulphur Springs Texas
Posts: 743
Likes: 146
Liked 166 Times in 46 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 439
Likes: 849
Liked 594 Times in 136 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Yes, the manifolds were the official explanation but the word I always got was that the real reason was internal politics. There was a time when the suits decided that Corvettes would always have the highest HP outputs. I had 2 L78 Corvettes and one L78 Nova - never saw any difference whatsoever. Sort of the same thing, but I remember a conversation with retired Chevrolet engineer Paul Pryor at Gainesville one year where I mentioned that the 70 Buick Stage 1 had the highest torque of any of the engines at 510 (the LS6 was 500). He immediately got a bit agitated about the games the different divisions were playing back then. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|