HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-27-2024, 08:03 PM   #1
Adger Smith
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
Default Re: Merry Christmas from NHRA HP adjuster

Bob,
Through all the 60 years I've been racing I have always heard the Corvette ratings were higher on like combinations because of the Stock Exhaust manifolds and the Stock Pan configuration. For the life of me I can't see how a Exhaust Manifold difference in all classes that allow aftermarket headers is even a consideration for HP variations. Now a Stocker with a Stocker pan.. I can see that there could be a difference...In Super Stock and Super Stock GT where aftermarket pans are allowed I don't see any reason to add HP to "like" engine combinations. Is NHRA Tech going back to some wheelbase considerations like in the old days with Ford and Mopar??
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS)
Adger Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 12-27-2024, 09:52 PM   #2
Jim Cimarolli
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sulphur Springs Texas
Posts: 743
Likes: 146
Liked 166 Times in 46 Posts
Default Re: Merry Christmas from NHRA HP adjuster

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adger Smith View Post
Bob,
Through all the 60 years I've been racing I have always heard the Corvette ratings were higher on like combinations because of the Stock Exhaust manifolds and the Stock Pan configuration. For the life of me I can't see how a Exhaust Manifold difference in all classes that allow aftermarket headers is even a consideration for HP variations. Now a Stocker with a Stocker pan.. I can see that there could be a difference...In Super Stock and Super Stock GT where aftermarket pans are allowed I don't see any reason to add HP to "like" engine combinations. Is NHRA Tech going back to some wheelbase considerations like in the old days with Ford and Mopar??
The 65 Corvette 425 hp 396 is a perfect example. in 66 it was rated at 375 in the Chevelle with a bigger cam!
Jim Cimarolli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2024, 03:17 PM   #3
Dan Bennett
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 439
Likes: 849
Liked 594 Times in 136 Posts
Default Re: Merry Christmas from NHRA HP adjuster

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Cimarolli View Post
The 65 Corvette 425 hp 396 is a perfect example. in 66 it was rated at 375 in the Chevelle with a bigger cam!

Yes, the manifolds were the official explanation but the word I always got was that the real reason was internal politics. There was a time when the suits decided that Corvettes would always have the highest HP outputs. I had 2 L78 Corvettes and one L78 Nova - never saw any difference whatsoever.

Sort of the same thing, but I remember a conversation with retired Chevrolet engineer Paul Pryor at Gainesville one year where I mentioned that the 70 Buick Stage 1 had the highest torque of any of the engines at 510 (the LS6 was 500). He immediately got a bit agitated about the games the different divisions were playing back then.
Dan Bennett is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.