|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 231
Likes: 35
Liked 478 Times in 91 Posts
|
![]()
Because Lonnie and Pat were approached about it while in Vegas and it was deemed LEGAL according to them....
__________________
Austin Williams 3 SG 464Q STK SC |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 200
Likes: 14
Liked 142 Times in 51 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Thibodaux, LA
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 327
Liked 1,018 Times in 217 Posts
|
![]()
Then there is no debate.
__________________
Brett Candies 4192 Stock/SS God Bless America |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,640
Likes: 1,937
Liked 10,713 Times in 2,230 Posts
|
![]()
Bracket racing until Heads-up
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 28
Likes: 24
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
This is not legal. It is altered body work. It also appears to have less than three inches of ground clearance which the the rule book clearly states
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,449
Likes: 615
Liked 1,926 Times in 579 Posts
|
![]()
The general rules specifically allow a beam breaker in any class. It even spells out the size, positioning and heights. The rule in Super stock does not have any mention of a beam breaker in that section of the rule book. So that is open to interpretation. We need a clarification from NHRA tech for stock and super stock.
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Thibodaux, LA
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 327
Liked 1,018 Times in 217 Posts
|
![]()
Maybe so Mr. Larry.
Let?s play this out, say your DragPak and ours goes head up with same engine combos. One of the cars has one of these contraptions hanging on the bottom of it, the other does not. Technically the car that has this so called gadget has an advantage, does it not? If yes, then my opinion, that it is an unequal advantage and should not be allowed in especially Stock Eliminator, period, for any reason. But, if no advantage, then no reason to have a rule.
__________________
Brett Candies 4192 Stock/SS God Bless America Last edited by Brett C; 04-29-2025 at 10:04 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,640
Likes: 1,937
Liked 10,713 Times in 2,230 Posts
|
![]()
It?s always fun to race y?all. As the rules are written I think the stripe taker is legal. If we race and y?all have one I have no complaints on the within the rules part. In my opinion the Candies teams play by the rules.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Thibodaux, LA
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 327
Liked 1,018 Times in 217 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
It obviously seems that tech didn't throw it out so?. I guess the debate now is should racers fight to make it illegal in stock at least???
__________________
Brett Candies 4192 Stock/SS God Bless America |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Brentwood, California
Posts: 98
Likes: 377
Liked 460 Times in 59 Posts
|
![]()
In my opinion and experience there are often different dimensions to rules.
For example
We have a Sportsman Racer Advisory Council (SRAC) comprised of 1 Stock or Super Stock rep from each division, plus an NHRA Division Director and technical representative. The stated purpose of the SRAC is to provide a means for discussing and evaluating rules and regulations pertaining to Sportsman racing at NHRA events. IMO This request is perfectly suited for their scope of work. I don't know that we need to fight for anything, but think it's a good idea to express opinions to our reps so they can best represent our collective interests.
__________________
Jim Grossi
SS 7856 |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|