|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Georgetown, Indiana (close to Louisville, KY)
Posts: 776
Likes: 530
Liked 230 Times in 106 Posts
|
![]()
I see on the hp adjustments they changed the hp rating on a 68 Corvette 327/325 motor. That's a mistake. They never made that combination in the Corvette. Are they talking the 327/350 stick only combo?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hampden, MA
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 233
Liked 774 Times in 164 Posts
|
![]()
They lowered the 325 hp motor in the Chevelle and Nova, so I would guess that you are correct. In the Corvette the 350hp/327 motor is the same as the other 2 bodys I believe. They just rated it at 350 because it is in the corvette.
__________________
Dave Casey 1330 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,105
Likes: 57
Liked 495 Times in 115 Posts
|
![]()
Dave is correct. Looking at the blueprint specs on the 327/350 in the Corvette and comparing it to the Nova/Chevelle 327/325 motor it appears they are identical Just the Corvette was rated higher for what ever reason. And yes it is a stick only motor.
__________________
68 Chevy11 327 F/S |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
Bob,
Through all the 60 years I've been racing I have always heard the Corvette ratings were higher on like combinations because of the Stock Exhaust manifolds and the Stock Pan configuration. For the life of me I can't see how a Exhaust Manifold difference in all classes that allow aftermarket headers is even a consideration for HP variations. Now a Stocker with a Stocker pan.. I can see that there could be a difference...In Super Stock and Super Stock GT where aftermarket pans are allowed I don't see any reason to add HP to "like" engine combinations. Is NHRA Tech going back to some wheelbase considerations like in the old days with Ford and Mopar??
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sulphur Springs Texas
Posts: 743
Likes: 146
Liked 166 Times in 46 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 437
Likes: 840
Liked 591 Times in 134 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Yes, the manifolds were the official explanation but the word I always got was that the real reason was internal politics. There was a time when the suits decided that Corvettes would always have the highest HP outputs. I had 2 L78 Corvettes and one L78 Nova - never saw any difference whatsoever. Sort of the same thing, but I remember a conversation with retired Chevrolet engineer Paul Pryor at Gainesville one year where I mentioned that the 70 Buick Stage 1 had the highest torque of any of the engines at 510 (the LS6 was 500). He immediately got a bit agitated about the games the different divisions were playing back then. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 91
Likes: 76
Liked 32 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,731
Likes: 2,795
Liked 2,471 Times in 696 Posts
|
![]()
Different body and different wheelbase.
My 360 Aspen wagon(112WB) used to be 19 HP more than the same 360 combo in a sedan(108WB). About 12/15 years ago. 289 vs 270 (Small lift cam 360) Now they are finally the same HP(289) last number of years after I quit trying to compete with them and installed a 318.
__________________
John Irving 741 Stock 741 Super Stock Last edited by GTX JOHN; 12-29-2024 at 06:03 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|