HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-13-2024, 08:33 AM   #1
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,494
Likes: 3,596
Liked 7,732 Times in 1,739 Posts
Default Re: Joe Sorenson

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Cour View Post
The hood is legal on a NON SS Camaro.
But the car has to be an SS to use the 350/300.
At least I'm glad that they changed the heads.
Must be a "west coast" rulebook thing. ;-)
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 11-13-2024, 09:50 AM   #2
Larry Hill
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,640
Likes: 1,937
Liked 10,712 Times in 2,230 Posts
Default Re: Joe Sorenson

I stated wrong information on head interchangeably. My apologies

The hood deal I have a little first hand knowledge how NHRA treated the E Body Cuda. If I ran one engine the car had to have this one hood. If I used a different engine I had a choice of two hoods but was not allowed to run the first hood. But if that interpretation has been removed I wish they would have published it.

What is OEM equipment on a 1969 Camaro, I have no idea.

Congratulations gentleman on your well earned Championship
__________________
IHM Used Parts
https://ihmusedparts.com
888-821-1817

Last edited by Larry Hill; 11-13-2024 at 04:00 PM.
Larry Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2024, 09:54 AM   #3
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,494
Likes: 3,596
Liked 7,732 Times in 1,739 Posts
Default Re: Joe Sorenson

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Hill View Post
The 350/255 engine will pass tech as a 350/ 300 but a 350/ 300 won?t pass tech for a 350/ 255. The 350/300 has a 12. 06 cc smaller chamber.

Congratulations gentleman on your well earned Championship
Umm no, the 350/255 can only use a 441 head casting. The 350/300 can use a number of head castings but not a 441.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2024, 09:55 AM   #4
Rory McNeil
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 317
Liked 1,104 Times in 302 Posts
Default Re: Joe Sorenson

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
But the car has to be an SS to use the 350/300.
At least I'm glad that they changed the heads.
Must be a "west coast" rulebook thing. ;-)
I have seen an awful lot of 67-69 Camaros wearing "Z/28" emblems that had 350/, 396 and 427 engines, AND Automatic transmissions, nobody seems to bat an eye. Weird huh? Also have seen fiberglass AAR hoods on non AAR Cudas, NHRA allows Powerglide cars use later 3 speed automatics, and don`t even get me started on all the new COPO, DragPak, and Cobra Jet Mustangs that come with Ford 9 inch rearends, Powerglides, and virtually zero engine components that actually came on the production models in the showrooms. Pretty sure a taller hood wouldn`t slow Joe down at all !
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK
M/S 85 Mustang
Rory McNeil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2024, 10:27 AM   #5
Sean Cour
Member
 
Sean Cour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 458
Likes: 170
Liked 124 Times in 39 Posts
Default Re: Joe Sorenson

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
But the car has to be an SS to use the 350/300.
At least I'm glad that they changed the heads.
Must be a "west coast" rulebook thing. ;-)
NHRA stopped Joe at the scales during the divisional and went over the car. Joe has a order form from GM stating you COULD order a non SS with a 350/300 combination.
__________________
Sean Cour
T6066 ladle

Last edited by Sean Cour; 11-13-2024 at 10:41 AM.
Sean Cour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2024, 10:37 AM   #6
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,494
Likes: 3,596
Liked 7,732 Times in 1,739 Posts
Default Re: Joe Sorenson

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Cour View Post
Joe has a letter from GM stating you COULD order a non SS with a 350/300 combination.
Oh I'd LOVE to see a copy of that letter and who signed it! I'm sure Jerry Mcniesh and about a hundred different Racers in Stock and SS would too!
I'm calling BS on that one.
It didn't come from the same guy who came up with the paperwork for the 780 Holleys and Edelbrock intakes on the AMCs did it?
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K

Last edited by Billy Nees; 11-13-2024 at 10:44 AM.
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 11-13-2024, 11:16 AM   #7
Cglrcng
Member
 
Cglrcng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Kingman, AZ
Posts: 410
Likes: 1,571
Liked 334 Times in 185 Posts
Default Re: Joe Sorenson

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
Oh I'd LOVE to see a copy of that letter and who signed it! I'm sure Jerry Mcniesh and about a hundred different Racers in Stock and SS would too!
I'm calling BS on that one.
It didn't come from the same guy who came up with the paperwork for the 780 Holleys and Edelbrock intakes on the AMCs did it?
I have to fully agree with Billy on that 1...The information must be provided directly to NHRA by the MFG. I also have the original 1984 Dodge Daytona factory showroom brochure published concerning all 3 models available that year and that I personally picked up at the same time we picked up the car I am driving that has all 3 shipping weights and other full specifications listed, and they are different than listed in the NHRA classification guide and they would not accept that data from me and adjust the actual shipping weight. And it would make an actual natural class fit difference. My combo was never shipped as light as the guide shows period. Data published elsewhere online also verifies the brochure specs and weights too. But, they flat out refuse to even look at the evidence and state they are not adjusting the shipping weight.

I am not stating I know anything about Camaro hoods or engine combos here at all, just pointing out the inconsistent ways NHRA deals with documentation and evidence, specs.

If the evidence exists look at it in all cases and rule on it, then publish it for all to use. But, that takes work. Laziness and economics rules the day these days it seems. Fairness to all takes a back seat.
__________________
Gary Lucier - 7832 STK. / 7832 E.T. EF/S Slow Sled. I am, but a simple test of your true patience. So, do all the really "Big Wheelies" you can!
Cglrcng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2024, 01:26 PM   #8
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,815
Likes: 2,904
Liked 5,121 Times in 1,952 Posts
Default Re: Joe Sorenson

First off Congrats to Joe and Hal
Well deserved for two guys who actually assemble their own engines and transmissions.

About the hood }
I have a good friend who bought a used Camaro (68, not 69). It was ordered with a 295 / 350 engine, Powerglide trans, column shifter, bench seat, and small dog dish style hubcaps .
It was badged as a SS car, but sure didn't look it from a few feet away. .
Anyway , it DID have the raised hood with the chrome simulated ports inserts on it.
I wonder if the original buyer knew you could un-order the heavier SS hood?
Again this was a 68 car. Interesting !
Also , we raced a 68 Chevy II ,that was ordered as a big block car ,with rubber floor mats . We ran it as a 350 /295 PG combo. Of course it had to have the SS hood on it.

As a matter of fact, as long as I've been racing, which is more than a few years, anything that came from GM @ 295 horse or more had to have a SS hood , or cowl induction on Camaros

Again, very interesting ...Who knew?
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2024, 02:07 PM   #9
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,494
Likes: 3,596
Liked 7,732 Times in 1,739 Posts
Default Re: Joe Sorenson

Mark, again I'm done with the hood on Joe's car BUT the GM archives says differently although it IS kinda confusing.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2024, 07:01 PM   #10
GTS340
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Las Vegas, Nv
Posts: 871
Likes: 270
Liked 1,344 Times in 410 Posts
Default Re: Joe Sorenson

How many 68-69 GTS darts came with a flat hood new and how many run in NHRA stock eliminator? I guess it isn't about the hood. Too many different GM combos for myself to know.

Paul H
GTS340 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.