|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Blue Ridge,Ga
Posts: 23
Likes: 24
Liked 20 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
I questioned Pat C last year why the 68 and 69 350/396 Camaros had different hp ratings because the 68 only had been reduced to 330. He said the reason was because of the intakes and if I wanted him to consider lowering the 69 to 330 then I had to send him both year intakes so he could scan them to see if they were equal. I had no interest in doing that so I left it at that. So now for some reason the Chevelles and the 68 Camaro are at 330 the 69 Camaro is still 340.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Belmont N.S. Canada
Posts: 473
Likes: 246
Liked 166 Times in 71 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Chris Chapman 1969 Chevelle NHRA F-G/SA 1090 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Monroe Twp NJ
Posts: 515
Likes: 1,056
Liked 1,031 Times in 283 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
This starts to fix that problem, but like everything else when it comes to class racers, nothing makes everyone happy. Including myself.
__________________
Duane Hoven 1342 SS/GT |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Belmont N.S. Canada
Posts: 473
Likes: 246
Liked 166 Times in 71 Posts
|
![]()
Well I geuss we should all be running one and only one approved combo, you know, to make it easier on everyone involved.
__________________
Chris Chapman 1969 Chevelle NHRA F-G/SA 1090 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: CT
Posts: 466
Likes: 1,860
Liked 397 Times in 153 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Phil Molski PMR Performance S/C 1623 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,506
Likes: 3,613
Liked 7,865 Times in 1,750 Posts
|
![]()
Soooooooooooo, how do "they" fix the problem? Go back to the "good-old-days" of not factoring body styles?
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 133
Liked 536 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
Personally, I think that much of the issues with the AHFS could be fixed by using a common sense approach. For example, If a 396/325 is rated 325 in a '68 Camaro, I can understand why it's rated slightly less, say 318, in a larger, heavier Chevelle. On the other hand, when there is a 20, 30, or 40 horsepower difference on the same engine in two different bodies styles, that shows no common sense at all.
__________________
Jim Kaekel 3836 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|