|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 570
Likes: 2
Liked 408 Times in 115 Posts
|
![]()
If it's allowed in AH, then keep it there, since AH has the own class, they should NOT be allowed to run the eliminator, or let all the others put one in.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 915
Likes: 1,132
Liked 682 Times in 203 Posts
|
![]()
Do you think going to R&P is going to make any car faster? The change may make it safer. I do believe an AH car kicked the rods through the pan and locked up the steering. As far as not allowing them to race in the eliminator is a stupid comment. How many Hemi Shoot Out races are there that really count in a year? Only one that counts, Indy. Have a happy Thanksgiving everyone! Dyno
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 503
Likes: 130
Liked 451 Times in 77 Posts
|
![]()
Yes, reduced windage in pan with centerlink tube removed, better header on drivers side. 5 to 10 hp and once one of the top guys update.... who can or will leave 5 to 10 horses on the table now. At the dutch the 4 cars in the semi's were almost identical. All had a shot at winning and was a great race!
My street Hemi has same centerlink going through pan as do a lot of other SS cars. My Corvette has centerlink hugging pan where if a rod comes out could do the same thing. If its safety from a rod taking it out, lets legalize aluminum rods..... Brian, I agree 100% but really think no SS car should have a R&P besides front conversions or cars that came from factory with them. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 315
Liked 1,103 Times in 301 Posts
|
![]()
Maybe better get rid of those pesky front torsion bars at the same time ! Coil overs, for safety, of course. A guy could bump his head on those dangerous torsion bars while installing the headers.
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK M/S 85 Mustang |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 846
Likes: 16
Liked 679 Times in 180 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 503
Likes: 130
Liked 451 Times in 77 Posts
|
![]()
Mission accomplished.... Real purpose of this thread was to see where NHRA came up with this idea. I felt NHRA should've questioned the top SS/AH cars or builders and yes Stephen is one of them. I know NHRA never contacted Robesonia
So NHRA made a decision from a top AH racer that publicly has his car for sale for at least the last 2 years who is trying to leave the class?!! $5k +/- update expense for "safety". I do want to know if the Spyphish car will be updated prior to the sale or sale price reduced for the new buyer. Asking for a friend |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 881
Likes: 206
Liked 309 Times in 173 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 846
Likes: 16
Liked 679 Times in 180 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Spyphish; 11-23-2022 at 11:21 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|