|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,815
Likes: 2,903
Liked 5,120 Times in 1,951 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
How about Nat'l winners> Bob Broadbent Dave Casey Barry Parker Dean Cook Vinny Barone John Shaul Michael Iacono Who am I missing? Oh yeah, last year's winner John Gray I WILL get a big laugh if one of these guys gets to the final ;-)
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 97
Likes: 48
Liked 397 Times in 68 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The list you gave is definitely a group of racers that I look up to and make sure I bring my "A game" when I stage up against them... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 438
Likes: 848
Liked 592 Times in 135 Posts
|
![]()
I'm getting ready to dive into a foxhole, but my opinion is that some people are not understanding what the reports are about.
Not the best analogy, but I've never seen any racer be offended by being left off the Tricky Tipster list. That was simply one person's (who changed over time) gut feeling considering performance levels, recent wins, and driving ability. The list here simply takes that from a gut feeling to a more specific analysis. I may be leaving some things out, but what gets you on the list is a number of things: recent reaction times, ability to run under the index, past success at a given track, ability to drive the stripe, and performance in eliminations so far this year. If you're being honest, those are the same things most racers would consider as they dial their car and plan their race. Being able to put numbers on things is much more accurate than gut feelings. In the days before 60' clocks, you'd hear about one car hooking better than the other. But when we got numbers, sometimes it was a case of a slower 60 but a better reaction. So they're looking at a lot of cold hard facts. And putting a rating on who is doing a better job. No, it is not 100% accurate since all of us have seen those occasions where the "impossible" or unlikely happens. It's an argument for another day, but those that think statistical analysis is not needed in drag racing probably should yank the data systems out of their cars and ask the track operator to shut off the clocks and just leave the win light. Last edited by Dan Bennett; 06-04-2022 at 12:42 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond Hill GA (and Port Ludlow WA)
Posts: 4,295
Likes: 2,382
Liked 3,174 Times in 971 Posts
|
![]()
I’m in the hole with you Dan. Know Alicia and Rusty (RIP) were formulating a plan to roll out this tool years ago and kudos to her for providing this resource. Don’t know the algorithm and while some anomalies such as Keith’s omission will no doubt be corrected by her in the near term it would behoove folks to use the data points provided to augment your strategy. Just looking at how analytics has changed baseball is a perfect example of winners using every tool available.
__________________
Jim Carter 2340 Super Stock 2340 SST/2340 Stock Set another place at the table |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 239
Liked 138 Times in 23 Posts
|
![]()
Hi guys! Thanks for all the feedback. Couple things:
Appreciate you all very much - happy racing! Alicia |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Dela-where?
Posts: 2,193
Likes: 1,160
Liked 1,877 Times in 577 Posts
|
![]()
I was first car in line and I don’t think they needed the stats to realize what was going on,
the first three cars switched lanes to get in behind me instead of beside me lol
__________________
KEITH MAYERS 2-1/2 X somebody Still many X nobody |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 239
Liked 138 Times in 23 Posts
|
![]()
Corrected rankings...sounds like the word is out
![]() Super Street Keith Mayers - Power Factor 55.6870, Win Probability 18.93% Brian Sawyer - Power Factor 55.1696, Win Probability 18.76% John Olson - Power Factor 30.7706, Win Probability 10.46% Raymond Knight - Power Factor 24.2121, Win Probability 8.23% Paul Lorenti - Power Factor 24.1937, Win Probability 8.23% Jason Mazzotta - Power Factor 21.0528, Win Probability 7.16% John Harper - Power Factor 18.9976, Win Probability 6.46% Robert Lohnes - Power Factor 14.7155, Win Probability 5.00% Kelly Kundratic - Power Factor 6.3877, Win Probability 2.17% Lou Avolio - Power Factor 5.4381, Win Probability 1.85% Field Win Probability 12.75% |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|