|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 712
Liked 1,577 Times in 581 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I believe that could be the scenario. However, the question is if they would admit they did it or blame the piston manufacturer and give them a black eye? It is a can of worms! If it keeps happening, I can see NHRA allowing any ring package and doing away with something else to inspect. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 232
Likes: 274
Liked 167 Times in 81 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Tim Schmackpfeffer 762 SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 712
Liked 1,577 Times in 581 Posts
|
![]()
Tim,
Thin piston rings with spacers have been allowed for a long time. There are lots of piston ring designs that can achieve the same as the gas ported rings. At the end of the day, it is having the ring hone finish, a round bore and compatible rings that make the power. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,810
Likes: 2,901
Liked 5,114 Times in 1,948 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
If they go that route, then REAL replacement Stock pistons are at even more of a disadvantage. Another shot at the budget racer, and another rule revision rammed through by the cheaters. So then what happens? Under weight pistons and rods? Knife edged cranks? Where does it end?
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 712
Liked 1,577 Times in 581 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I just pointed to a plausible aftermath with everything that has taken place in the past. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|