|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 351
Likes: 62
Liked 126 Times in 61 Posts
|
![]()
There are many ways to slice that apple to .90. NHRA wants to do less work and the Super classes and Top classes allow them the luxury. There are fewer tech guys that know what is what on a stocker these days. When they shot Modified Elim. between the eyes, that was the beginning. Dam I am getting old.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Fulton County, PA
Posts: 614
Likes: 16
Liked 920 Times in 259 Posts
|
![]()
I like most kinds of drag racing - they are all challenging in their own way - and find the variety of things one can do on a simple dragstrip to be interesting. Some are about performance, some are about precision; both of which appeal to me.
I may think that some of what is being done is crap, but I mostly stay quiet about it and remain grateful that those folks show up and spend the money that keep the tracks, parts manufacturers, machine shops, chassis shops and anyone else involved gainfully employed - and keep butts in the seats. No body gets here and gets to be successful at their chosen pursuit without paying some dues. Wishing for a certain group to disappear isn't helpful to anyone. It's bad enough that there are people sitting in boardrooms who have the power to keep people from participating and regardless the method or reasons that make sense to them, they're doing it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,449
Likes: 615
Liked 1,926 Times in 579 Posts
|
![]()
As much as I would like to see more quota in the stock and super stock classe the .90 cars have earned their place. They race hard and are dedicated to their type of racing. I do think that they need a pretty good index adjustment of at least .5 to get them off of the stop for such a long delay. Might make it less boring at least in SG. The SC dragster parade is terminally boring no matter what they do with that class.10:0, 9.0 and 8.0 might be some better indexes for those classes and be more in line with what they are actually capable of running.
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Wingdale, NY
Posts: 302
Likes: 27
Liked 53 Times in 16 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Those “super classes” are money makers for NHRA, many entrants, no tech issues, etc. I can not imagine NHRA ever wanting to limit them.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 340
Likes: 832
Liked 350 Times in 134 Posts
|
![]()
Old Timer Here, Guys:
I enjoy watching, have raced, and have numerous friends in the .90 Classes. I agree that we all deserve a place in the NHRA system. While I can offer no more suggestions to the overcrowding issues than what has been suggested here on this forum, if NHRA, DID INDEED, think that .90 classes would be more popular, they were SORELY incorrect. There was nothing more fun than watching a round of high-revving Modified Eliminator qualifying or eliminations. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1,179
Liked 684 Times in 289 Posts
|
![]()
As for Modified Eliminator…
...Vinny explains it best ![]() https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q...A082&FORM=VIRE Last edited by Mike Jones; 01-15-2020 at 10:23 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
|
![]()
As much as we all loved Modified Eliminator and it never should have been dropped when it was, I believe it would have slowly died or dwindled anyway...
To much breakage and expensive to stay competitive....and I was involved with cars that ran it so I know first hand.....I saw guys quit after breaking an engine and just say enough is enough..... Competition eliminator is the modern day equivalent of modified and just look at the car counts there at many races.....unsustainable ….
__________________
Rich Biebel S/C 1479 Stock 147R |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vineland, NJ
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 96
Liked 1,283 Times in 392 Posts
|
![]()
You guys are also talking about them dropping Modified Production in the early 80’s. When the .90 classes started it was an affordable way to get into racing for most and there were no throttle stops at the time so fans enjoyed it. “WE” did it to ourselves and NHRA just let it go, it’s like telling your kid to go to the market to get milk and bread and they come home with candy, doughnuts & soda. If they wanted to keep it in check, they would have set a mph limit, cubic inc limit on motors or lowered the index’s. It got out of hand and because it’s still a money maker for NHRA, $320 to enter for $1,800 to win and you’re taking 50-70 cars per class, why get rid of it?
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|