|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 637
Likes: 27
Liked 254 Times in 78 Posts
|
![]()
Note that the 69 318 is at 172, same specs as 73. A 69 charger can run R, T and U.
__________________
Mike Moller NHRA 203 Q-R-T/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond Hill GA (and Port Ludlow WA)
Posts: 4,297
Likes: 2,383
Liked 3,184 Times in 973 Posts
|
![]()
Nowhere in a dime thread can you squeeze a 69 Charger, sorry you just can’t, it’s plum immoral. Have always been intrigued by these cheaper slow rollers (if you watched Warren’s excellent show from the Vegas LODRS race and didn’t find yourself rooting for Ellam’s Pinto then you shouldn’t be looking at this thread) and the thought of squeezing in a little Escort stocker in place of a golf cart is starting my wheels turning.
__________________
Jim Carter 2340 Super Stock 2340 SST/2340 Stock Set another place at the table |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 3,600
Liked 7,756 Times in 1,741 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 3,600
Liked 7,756 Times in 1,741 Posts
|
![]()
Spending some time reading old threads on classracer!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Div. 6, Eastern, WA
Posts: 710
Likes: 2,671
Liked 240 Times in 112 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Dave Noll, EF/S ,?/SA 6526 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Youngsville, N.C.
Posts: 623
Likes: 281
Liked 409 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]()
Before I had decided on building my Camaro, I had tossed around putting together an ‘83 Monte Carlo 305 small Cam dish piston combo together for N/SA. No roll- bar required. Only went with the Camaro because of the cost. The Camaro already had an 8.5 rear and would have had to locate one for a Monte due to it’s only 7.5 plus I located a Camaro body fairly easy.
__________________
Joe Huestis "Annie's Song" Racing U/SA 2724 Youngsville, NC |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Jersey
Posts: 213
Likes: 194
Liked 863 Times in 165 Posts
|
![]()
A combo that may be competitive if it was in the guide would be a 2000 explorer with the 5.0. Factory rated at 215hp and 4,200 pound shipping weight puts it at 19.5. The gt40p heads are WAY better than any production small block ford head out of the box, and the intakes are very desirable among the 5.0 community. The camshaft lift may be low at .422/.448, but other small cam 302 combinations have made good power before. If anything it would be a good engine for GT.
Last edited by Doug Hoven; 03-24-2020 at 03:22 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|