HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-22-2017, 02:41 PM   #1
nolongerracing
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 175
Likes: 2
Liked 72 Times in 27 Posts
Default Re: Aftermarket/Replacement Cylinder Head Rule Change

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erik Jones View Post
Everyone needs to realize that we all need replacement heads if we want to continue to race Stock And Superstock. The replacement head has to have the same spec as the OEM it is replacing. This is no different than the FE Ford, Big Block Dodge and Big Block Chevy. If anyone thinks the port shape is worth something major in a .400" lift Stocker you probably read to many "High performance Books".
Just relax and grow with the times....
So... how do you plan on getting the 172 cc intake port down to 165 cc without epoxy or welding? That's the problem.
nolongerracing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2017, 02:55 PM   #2
ron mattson
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: cloquet mn
Posts: 468
Likes: 17
Liked 69 Times in 32 Posts
Default Re: Aftermarket/Replacement Cylinder Head Rule Change

the mopar 273 has a replacement head WAY bigger than factory cc so do some others, if you live in a humid climate you would welcome the not rusting property
of aluminum.
__________________
Ron Mattson 5015 STK
ron mattson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2017, 04:29 PM   #3
Erik Jones
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 61
Likes: 1
Liked 47 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: Aftermarket/Replacement Cylinder Head Rule Change

Quote:
Originally Posted by nolongerracing View Post
So... how do you plan on getting the 172 cc intake port down to 165 cc without epoxy or welding? That's the problem.
Its actually pretty easy. Thats what we get paid to do.
__________________
Erik Jones
Erik Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2017, 05:01 PM   #4
KEN BUGAJ
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: LEXINGTON NC.
Posts: 389
Likes: 43
Liked 18 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: Aftermarket/Replacement Cylinder Head Rule Change

Sounds like NHRA now has Crate Motors !

Last edited by KEN BUGAJ; 12-22-2017 at 05:03 PM.
KEN BUGAJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2017, 06:28 PM   #5
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
Default Re: Aftermarket/Replacement Cylinder Head Rule Change

Quote:
Originally Posted by ken bugaj View Post
sounds like nhra now has crate motors !
bing !!! :d

d
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2017, 09:30 AM   #6
Larry Hill
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,684
Likes: 1,993
Liked 11,020 Times in 2,265 Posts
Default Re: Aftermarket/Replacement Cylinder Head Rule Change

Dang, Jones you made me loose my place in my latest go fast book. All kidding aside Eric does some really nice work, look at Mike Cotten, Eric Bell, some FE Fords, and a host of others that are real fast. Eric does hard smart work.
__________________
IHM Used Parts
https://ihmusedparts.com
888-821-1817
Larry Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2017, 11:49 AM   #7
Dick Butler
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: Aftermarket/Replacement Cylinder Head Rule Change

Sorry to remind you but a nice list of five or six "spec" motors could replace ALL the motors and limit costs, parts chasing, tech difficulty and limit number of overall classes stick and auto could get back to more "class racing" . Someone has to begin to constructively plan for the future of class racing. Racer could use current car and any of the motors based on lb per cubic inch instead of continual bogus hp movements to fit choice of classes.

No I am not currently racing so some are welcome to object to me offering thought but the BIG picture is the problem not the aftermarket fit of a head or ccs etc.
Dick Butler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2017, 01:18 PM   #8
Casey Miles
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 706
Likes: 128
Liked 508 Times in 92 Posts
Default Re: Aftermarket/Replacement Cylinder Head Rule Change

I'm thinking that this is just another watering down of Stock eliminator. There are plenty of sbc heads out there, just bending the options which deminishes the word "Stock".

Casey Miles
248H
Casey Miles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2017, 02:05 PM   #9
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,139
Likes: 1,620
Liked 1,931 Times in 435 Posts
Default Re: Aftermarket/Replacement Cylinder Head Rule Change

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Butler View Post
Sorry to remind you but a nice list of five or six "spec" motors could replace ALL the motors and limit costs, parts chasing, tech difficulty and limit number of overall classes stick and auto could get back to more "class racing" . Someone has to begin to constructively plan for the future of class racing. Racer could use current car and any of the motors based on lb per cubic inch instead of continual bogus hp movements to fit choice of classes.

No I am not currently racing so some are welcome to object to me offering thought but the BIG picture is the problem not the aftermarket fit of a head or ccs etc.

Nothing personal, but that has to be one of the worst ideas to come down the pike in years. Why call it "Stock Eliminator" at all at that point? "Spec Engine Eliminator"?
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2017, 02:33 PM   #10
HR9121
Live Reporter
 
HR9121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Bern, NC
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 146
Liked 3,363 Times in 731 Posts
Default Re: Aftermarket/Replacement Cylinder Head Rule Change

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Butler View Post
Sorry to remind you but a nice list of five or six "spec" motors could replace ALL the motors and limit costs, parts chasing, tech difficulty and limit number of overall classes stick and auto could get back to more "class racing" . Someone has to begin to constructively plan for the future of class racing. Racer could use current car and any of the motors based on lb per cubic inch instead of continual bogus hp movements to fit choice of classes.

No I am not currently racing so some are welcome to object to me offering thought but the BIG picture is the problem not the aftermarket fit of a head or ccs etc.
Nothing personal about this idea but this was another socialist idea that was going to save grass roots circle track racing and as we all know didn't work for them either. The money will always win out, always has and always will.
NHRA has its flaws but still is the best game in town. Car counts are steadily coming back after the years following the recession and I suspect they will improve again this year with a ever more improving economy. It has its flaws but its not broken so I wish everyone would quit trying to fix it. Its not the 70's or 80's anymore and people are not drawn to cars like they were at one time, there are too many options for people to enjoy their time with so I think under the circumstances NHRA is doing quite well.
__________________
James Williamson
W200 J/SA. SS/JA
HR9121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.