A case for Tru-Start

[Peter Ash]

What's next?

Best overall average?

reaction time +/-

+

closest to dial +/-

Oh wait, we already have golf.

[Ed Wright]

Originally Posted by peter ash

what's next?

Best overall average?

Reaction time +/-

+

closest to dial +/-

oh wait, we already have golf.

lmbo!!

[JWagner]

If Tru-Start were in effect in 2016 Brad Burton would be world champ in stock eliminator. Jeff Strickland would not have won Bristol.

[Carguy49]

Originally Posted by JWagner

If Tru-Start were in effect in 2016 Brad Burton would be world champ in stock eliminator. Jeff Strickland would not have won Bristol.

We can look at a lot of numbers and second guess the outcome of many events. Bob Gullett wouldn't have won the World Finals either, Jody Lang would have been in the final.

I've got a good question - - - How many of all the runs made in competition, for Stock and Super Stock competitors, would have been decided differently by Tru-Start???? I am guessing less than 1/10th of 1%.

[Bob Mulry]

Originally Posted by Carguy49

We can look at a lot of numbers and second guess the outcome of many events. Bob Gullett wouldn't have won the World Finals either, Jody Lang would have been in the final.

I've got a good question - - - How many of all the runs made in competition, for Stock and Super Stock competitors, would have been decided differently by Tru-Start???? I am guessing less than 1%.

If your 1% number is correct that would be a little over 1 race decided by TruStart in every 128 car field......

[Carguy49]

Good point Bob. In fact I meant to say less than 1/10th of 1%. If you look I have edited my post to say just that. Thanks Bob.

[Lenny5160]

Originally Posted by Carguy49

Good point Bob. In fact I meant to say less than 1/10th of 1%. If you look I have edited my post to say just that. Thanks Bob.

The races run on TruSTART so far have shown that a little OVER 1% of the race results are different than they would be on a traditional timing system.