HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-21-2016, 06:01 PM   #1
Lenny5160
Senior Member
 
Lenny5160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Inver Grove Heights, MN
Posts: 898
Likes: 604
Liked 431 Times in 224 Posts
Default Re: LODRS Divisional schedules

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Lee View Post
could this be an error

Rocky Mountain Raceways Sept. 21-22
Rocky Mountain Raceways Sept. 23-24
No, Rocky Mountain has had a double divisional for at least the past two years.

D5 has a similar event in Topeka at the end of July.
__________________
S/ST 51
S/C 53
Lenny5160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2016, 12:00 AM   #2
Bernie Cunningham
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 560
Likes: 45
Liked 52 Times in 17 Posts
Default Re: LODRS Divisional schedules

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lenny5160 View Post
No, Rocky Mountain has had a double divisional for at least the past two years.

D5 has a similar event in Topeka at the end of July.
What a waste of effort !!

That track is so far off the D7 location and it gets 2 LODRS races. It's high (in altitude), dusty and a long way to travel for most, it's just not a favorable place to go to! (even rained there this year with big delays)

I don't get it, there are a few other tracks that are centrally located that could handle a double and I reckon they would get a better car count.

Promote the double back to Bakersfield for instance! I know the track owner is stubborn but negotiate it !

Most don't know this but Pomona has two available weekends for Drag Racing ( RULES and LAWS) that they don't use, ---- the local City Ordinance allows it. Problem is there is no personnel or administration to handle a single LODRS let alone a double that's needed to work an event. Sure would be good for Div 7, it wouldn't get any better than that HUH.

Got me one EDIT in per Fletchburger too !! HE!
__________________
Bernie Cunningham 7053 STK

Last edited by Bernie Cunningham; 11-23-2016 at 12:32 AM.
Bernie Cunningham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2016, 01:31 PM   #3
Bob Mulry
VIP Member
 
Bob Mulry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Coarsegold, CA
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 57
Liked 320 Times in 102 Posts
Default Re: LODRS Divisional schedules

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bernie Cunningham View Post
What a waste of effort !!

That track is so far off the D7 location and it gets 2 LODRS races. It's high (in altitude), dusty and a long way to travel for most, it's just not a favorable place to go to! (even rained there this year with big delays)

I don't get it, there are a few other tracks that are centrally located that could handle a double and I reckon they would get a better car count.

Promote the double back to Bakersfield for instance! I know the track owner is stubborn but negotiate it !

Most don't know this but Pomona has two available weekends for Drag Racing ( RULES and LAWS) that they don't use, ---- the local City Ordinance allows it. Problem is there is no personnel or administration to handle a single LODRS let alone a double that's needed to work an event. Sure would be good for Div 7, it wouldn't get any better than that HUH.

Got me one EDIT in per Fletchburger too !! HE!
Bernie,

If the moron that runs Division 7 got his act together we wouldn't need doubles..................

What happened to Bakersfield, Tucson and Sacramento??????????

Bob
__________________
Bob Mulry 7516 STK
A & M Motorsports
Bob Mulry is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.