|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 69
Liked 279 Times in 68 Posts
|
![]()
I find it comical that you folks attack me and don't ever address the underlying problem of allowing these bogus horsepower ratings and shipping weights. Charlie I raced for more than 30 years and still work on Andrew's car and haul it around for him and contribute a little financially.
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 2,191
Liked 2,364 Times in 560 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The shipping weights had to be adjusted for the new cars. You can't legally get them heavy enough to make the weights that some want. That is, once you remove everything that isn't required by the rules. I really don't see how a change to this would make a qualifying difference. I would rather run in A/B/C over a slower class. I guarantee that it will be easier on parts. As an FYI. I purchased a zero option 2012 Camaro SS just to prove that the published 2010 specification submitted by Chevrolet was wrong. Note that the automatic SS was factory rated at 400 HP. So, if you look at the reduction it got from that perspective, Andrew's Camaro got the same break that I did. I am not mad at him for that....... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|