|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: HOUMA, LA
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Not sure but I dont beleive that it was ever stated that new cars weren't faster than any old car. I believe that the case but if you get the older cars to where they can push the new cars to take hits wont it even up the field? Why is such a sin to have the new cars in stock? Lets see its 2014 why would anyone not want to see todays latest and greatest in what was started for present day drag racing? It has to be a mixed field for it keep the sport going. But hey I'm only 33yrs old and love to see new muscle cars put them on the back bumper and still run 150mph! ![]()
__________________
JOSEPH TEUTON 4044 STK,SS, |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cajun country
Posts: 339
Likes: 51
Liked 34 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Hagen Gary; 09-09-2014 at 05:22 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 68
Liked 279 Times in 68 Posts
|
![]()
The solution is simple. A through F FX classes for cars that were made in 2008 and later without a vin number and motor combinations that were not in street cars. 1lb weight breaks, sticks and autos together, or not. They could stay in stock eliminator, but they could not beat up on the older cars in class or heads up. As for the Factory Stock race at Indy, that needs to be it's own race and have nothing to do with stock eliminator
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Mike Carr, Tri-State S/SS Association President Looking for 2015 S/SS Race Sponsors Contact me if interested buffdaddy_1302@hotmail.com (724) 510-5912 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 2,166
Liked 2,351 Times in 553 Posts
|
![]()
Would you be OK with this for all Stock classes?
Quote:
Who would put up the extra money for all this new stuff? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 68
Liked 279 Times in 68 Posts
|
![]()
What money? We got more in 1990 than we do now. The Hemi cars in Super Stock can get horsepower, plus they have one of the toughest indexes in SS.
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Potomac,IL
Posts: 279
Likes: 1
Liked 71 Times in 23 Posts
|
![]()
Back when the LT-1 cars were kicking our butts, (cost me a div. championship) the only people that were complaining about them were the people in their class and were getting beat heads up. Nobody else cared.
I think the new cars are neat, but they aren't stock eliminator cars. Like everyone has stated, put them in there own class and problem solved. What still cracks me up today is the fact that the rule book states "no porting or polishing of cylinder heads". All the new cars have CNC'ed cylinder heads. The manufactures just simply ignored all the rules in stock eliminator and built them how they wanted. Where NHRA really messed up is not telling them if that's the engines you want to run that's fine, but they are going to be superstock cars. While I am at it, I begged for years for a weight break or three speed trans for the 67 and 68 camaro's with a small block 295/350. Since the 69-70 camaro with 295/350 could run a three speed trans. Always fell on deaf ears, till Chrysler didn't put a three speed in the guide for the drag Pak and GM and Ford did. All the new drag Pak owners cried and got a three speed rule change. No one cared until it affected the new cars.
__________________
Monte Howard 3209 STK, 3208 SS Last edited by Monte Howard; 09-09-2014 at 06:47 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dripping Springs, Tx
Posts: 2,709
Likes: 186
Liked 520 Times in 132 Posts
|
![]()
If everyone ran their car like this gentleman this thread wouldn't be necessary.
2 3695 E/S Luke Ubelhor, Bristow IN, '09 Challenger 10.103 11.65 -1.547
__________________
Ed Carpenter 2005 Chevy Cobalt A/SM Race Engine Development |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cajun country
Posts: 339
Likes: 51
Liked 34 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
That's an interesting take on it. And it's hard to argue with. Other than some might take it as you saying new car owners arnt gentlemen.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 68
Liked 279 Times in 68 Posts
|
![]()
Ed, Luke is a very nice guy. That car of his has a 5.7 Hemi that before Indy was rated at 305hp. The automatic is rated at 421. Keith Lynch could of gone 9.80 in A/SA with one. Luke won't be hurt a bit.
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|