|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
^^ I agree. I've often wondered what would happen if I got paired up with one of those 8 sec. "VIN-less" cars and I trap at 106 mph and he comes buzzing past me at 150 plus mph.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 2,169
Liked 2,354 Times in 554 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
|
![]()
The difference I was referring to is that I do not have a roll bar....yet.
All Super Stockers require a roll bar at minimum.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 2,169
Liked 2,354 Times in 554 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
|
![]()
Dunno.
I will say that earlier this year I was at a combo race and in the 2nd round I got paired with the SS/GT Mustang that just won at Indy over the weekend. Needless to say, I perked up when he came buzzing by me at the finish line. Thus...the reason I think about the mph difference more with my "bar-less" Stocker. The bar is going in this winter.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lower Slower Delaware
Posts: 535
Likes: 22
Liked 269 Times in 99 Posts
|
![]()
If the manufacturers want the big stage of NHRA Class Racing they need to pony up the ca$h for a separate eliminator, pay for TV coverage and see if it turns into sales. Just a marketing strategy.
The issue with Stock Eliminator in Indy was the the gift of no HP for the Factory Shootout Cars plain and simple. Bobby's post makes this clear.
__________________
Frank Ferrucci I/SA 1271 "Be Thankful for the Gifts You are Given" Last edited by Signman; 09-02-2014 at 10:51 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
Who says it isn't?
![]() Rules are minimum guidelines, not maximums. If I were to seriously race the Turismo again, particularly in 1/4-mile country, I would give heavy consideration to putting a roll bar in it.
__________________
Michael Beard - NHRA/IHRA 3216 S/SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]()
Attachment did not upload. Will try again.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 317
Liked 1,104 Times in 302 Posts
|
![]()
I`m curious as to why the factorys didn`t promote their actual production line cars, like the Mustang GT/Boss 302/Shelby, Chevys SS/Z28/ZL1 Camaros, and the various MoPar Challengers.
Factory HP ratings too high? Not enough exotic/trick factory pieces? Lack of OE offered Powerglides and Ford 9" rearends? Factory shipping weights too high? I always thought much of the challenge of Stock was making the best of the obstacles the compromised factory parts that you had to work with. It would appear that the "Big 3" have avoided any such nusiances, by creating a bunch of purpose built, max effort race cars, using a blank sheet of paper to eliminate having to deal with any pesky OE production compromise designs. And then by making minor spec tweaks each year, they assure themselves of always having another under rated combination in the wings. Nice. Kinda like a NFL Pro football team beating up on a high school team. . And having somebody come on here to talk about how much time and effort hey have spent to make their new 2014 factory race car competetive against a guy who has been thrashing on his "nostalgia" combo for 20,30, or more years, in a slap in the face.
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK M/S 85 Mustang |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 1,450
Liked 4,365 Times in 501 Posts
|
![]()
Just make the FS/A index 9.60 and FS/B 9.85, problem solved. Of course FS cars should be subject to AHFS like the rest of us though, that was pretty much a joke but a great marketing technique to guarantee that a boatload of new Chevrolets got to run all out, get lots of spots in the Stock Eliminator field, compete at and eventually win the 60th annual Chevrolet US nationals!
Some numbers to ponder: -The qualified average for all the FS cars at Indy was -1.255 under. -The average for all entered FS cars was -1.1985 under, not counting Bill Skillman or Jim Harrison. -25 of 30 FS cars made the field. -The average qualified NON-FS stocker was -1.004 under -33 of the these were factory race cars averaging -1.056 under. -58 factory race cars made up the field of 128 --> 45% of the field. -The average for all entered NON-FS, NON FACTORY RACE CAR stockers was -.897 under, not counting Jim Tool. The bump was -.882 under. And just for the hell of it: -5 NON-FS cars will get immediate HP today, 3 of which are factory race cars. -30 NON-FS cars will be subject to review, 17 of which are factory race cars. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|