HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-21-2014, 11:32 AM   #1
Michael Beard
VIP Member
 
Michael Beard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: Wagon Train

Quote:
the 4.6 l Mustang GT was rated at 300 hp SAE net. The Cobra Jet version was rated at 235 with more of everything than the street car.

When the manufacturers went from gross hp ratings in 1971 to net hp ratings in1972 NHRA factored all those motors 1972 and up before they hit the race track. Al Provoast told me his wagon went from 185 to 285 before he ever went down the track. The motor I run in my car is a 71 350 Z28 motor that was rated at 330 from the factory and is now rated at 315. The same exact motor in 1972 was factory rated at 255. In those days NHRA did their job. The first time they didn't was the 94 Chevy LT1 which was rated at 275 net and allowed to run at that hp rating, and is now at 346.
Several other examples I've looked up, seems like a difference of about 70HP is ballpark for a lot of these combinations. They could've started out most combos about 50HP higher than what they did, at least get them close to the right zip code, save several years of AHFS and gamesmanship, while still being favorable combinations to buy/build.
__________________
Michael Beard - NHRA/IHRA 3216 S/SS
Michael Beard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2014, 11:36 AM   #2
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Wagon Train

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Beard View Post
Several other examples I've looked up, seems like a difference of about 70HP is ballpark for a lot of these combinations. They could've started out most combos about 50HP higher than what they did, at least get them close to the right zip code, save several years of AHFS and gamesmanship, while still being favorable combinations to buy/build.
If you can get SS engine builder to talk about it (I may have burned a bridge) you will likely hear 70 is not at all too much.

At least they took some heat off the LT1, which has a bigger advantage in Stock than SS.
I know why, but would be in trouble again if I told it here. LOL
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.